On Happy Marriages: Patience, Loyalty, and Priorities
I've been waiting for this news to come out so I could write this column. Mack Brown was given a pay raise to bump his annual salary to about $2.5 million, making him the third-highest paid coach in the country.
The news in and of itself is unexceptional. Mack was already one of the highest paid coaches around, and the raise itself only ensures that he'll remain among the top five paid coaches in the country. I'm happy to see Brown get the raise, and equally happy the university didn't go overboard like Notre Dame did with Charlie Weiss.
I've been waiting for this news because I wanted to use it as a vehicle to talk about patience, loyalty, and priorities/values. I'm going to try to do this without sounding -too- preachy...
About fifteen months ago, Texas lost to Oklahoma 12-0, their fifth straight loss to the Sooners. Many fans, myself included, reacted angrily and, in many cases, petulantly. Those carrying the sharpest pitchforks were calling for Mack to be fired. Others, more justifiably, wanted Greg Davis canned. In reality, though, UT Athletic Director Deloss Dodds never even considered firing Mack Brown. He made public statements about the strength of the program as a whole and urged fans to take the long view--the whole view. And here's where we get to what I want to talk about.
Mack Brown isn't the sexiest college football coach. He doesn't have the charisma of Pete Carroll, or the pedigree of Charlies Weiss, or (until now) the trophies of Nick Saban or Bob Stoops. He talks kind of funny. People fault him for being too kind. In short, Mack's detractors talked endlessly about what he couldn't do. Can't beat Oklahoma. Can't win a conference title. Can't do this. Can't do that.
Too few of us, though, and we were not always above it here at BON, were honed in on all the things he did bring to the table. Well, one national title later and we're all singing a different tune. The point of this is not to say that Mack Brown didn't deserve careful scrutiny, or that all of the criticisms of him were unfair or off base, only that we need to take greater caution in how we apply those criticisms. I think it takes a certain maturity, as a person or as a sports fan, to get past looking at things this way. I think there's a real danger in life for those that focus too much on what a person isn't, or can't do.
Take dating, for example. I have certain friends that spend all of their energy evaluating women in terms of what they aren't. She's not hot enough. She's not fun enough. She talks funny. She doesn't go out enough. She goes out too much. Other people don't like her enough. Well, you know what? The idea is not to find the single hottest girl in the world. You girlfriend doesn't have to have Marilyn vos Savant's IQ. She needn't come from the richest family in town. We get so bogged down in the extremes of these qualities that we lose sight of the things that are actually important. In the case of dating, you need a partner. You need someone that YOU are attracted to; it doesn't matter if anyone else is. You need someone that engages you, even if she's not as fascinating to your friends. We get lost trying to find a girl that answers to these extreme standards instead of seeking out someone that delivers on the values and priorities of our own lives. It's a vicious trap and some people never get past it.
And we almost fell in to that trap with Mack Brown. He wasn't the sexiest coach in the room. He was easy for outsiders to snicker at. He had all kinds of warts, just like every human being in the world. But in the end, he was a great partner and we were lucky to have him. Above all, he built a program that we could be proud of. He operates with integrity. He is humble and kind and generous. He treats others with respect. He values the history of the institution and the program. As Texans, and, specifically, as Longhorns, what could be a higher priority than that? Especially considering how much success we were having? Where was the patience, where was our loyalty? What were our priorities?
In the end, the university stuck with Mack Brown, warts and all, and it's a happy ending. The point, of course, is that things have been good all along. It's easy to forget that--both in sports, and in life. Count your blessings, boys and girls. Don't take the good for granted. The grass, I'm afraid, isn't always greener on the other side.
--PB--
0 recs |
15 comments
Comments
Peter
by AdamDC on Jan 30, 2006 12:19 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
How'd you guess?
by Peter Bean on Jan 30, 2006 12:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You lost me at hello
PB, I like the dating analogy but there's a reason the divorce rate in this country is over 50% and good college coaches get fired with winning percentages well above 700 - in America, we (especially UT fans) wholeheartedly believe that we are entitled to liberty, justice and the right to ask what the fuck have you done for me lately.
As much as I'd like to believe Longhorns fans wil remember what Mack has accomplished in his tenure on the 40 acres, it will not surprise me in the least to hear about a "firemackbrown" web site being erected less than two seconds after Mack Brown's next loss.
Jim Tressel won a Natty C a few years back and those Bucknuts were calling for his head after our game with them last September. Even Bob Stoops wasn't immune from the Sooners' wrath this season. Most ironic of all, there were OU fans claiming that Bob Stoops couldn't win the "big game" after losing consecutive BCS National Championships as if teams get there every day.
Individuals are smart and rational, but people are dumb. I hope you post that commentary again after Mack loses a couple of games. Chances are good this message board will be lit up like Christmas Tree and we'll all be hanging Mack in effigy once again (present company included).
by 54b on Jan 30, 2006 12:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Overall, from the beginnings of this blog, Andrew and I have resisted calling for Mack's head. The closest we got was saying that "discussion of whether or not to fire Mack Brown was fair." Still, we emphasized that we were proud of the program, we continued to have high success, and that firing Mack Brown would be too much. We suggested, alternatively, that he needed to look closely at Greg Davis if the offense continued to die in big games. At this point, even that's off the table.
There's little to complain about now, but even when the going gets rough, I hope we'll all remember how good we have it.
Easier said than done, eh?
by Peter Bean on Jan 30, 2006 12:45 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
$2 T-shirts for sale.
I know a guy who has a few thousand of these high quality shirts.
by AdamDC on Jan 30, 2006 12:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
what a deal
by jimmer on Jan 30, 2006 2:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Greg Davis
Vince (as well as Major) both had raw talent that turned them into game winners. However, look at Chris Simms. Chris never received proper coaching at the collegiate level. He seems to be doing okay in the NFL, but part of me will always hate him for that Big 12 championship game against Colorado.
I'm worried that our new starting QB, whether Snead or McCoy, is going to send us into another Simms era because of Greg Davis' inability to coach the position.
by chief on Jan 30, 2006 12:48 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
new QB's
by NM on Jan 30, 2006 12:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh come on
Simms was a great quarterback; he just never matured in to a big game guy. And Greg Davis, like every good coach, has learned and adjusted. We only set an NCAA record for most points scored in a year in 2005. What else do you want?
by Peter Bean on Jan 30, 2006 1:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Vince
by chief on Jan 30, 2006 1:09 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Travis
by AdamDC on Jan 30, 2006 1:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Locked up
by chief on Jan 30, 2006 1:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
didnt that happen in a baseball game?
by AdamDC on Jan 30, 2006 1:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Take a look around
Fact is, no other coach the last ten years has put up numbers in the win column like Mack. While Lloyd Carr and Larry Coker are busy firing assistants, Mack is getting a pay raise. Even genius coaches like Stoops and Tressel stumble from time to time.
IMO, the popularity he's injected in to football is paying dividends for the entire AD.
Take it from someone who was on the 40 when Mackovic was fired. Nothing personal against Mack II, but he was a terrible fit for Texas and his teams were wildly unpredictable. He just wasn't, you know, Mack.
I'll give Mackovic credit for the talent he brought in, because James Brown and Ricky were more important to the image of UT than any other players from the last 20 years. They made it "cool" for kids from the inner city to play at UT. Until then Austin was pretty much a white man's country club. But everything from his wine collection to his treatment of alumni and HS coaches made him a bad fit. His break down at Arizona wasn't just an aberration. His weeping on television was a collection of pent up frustration from years of mediocre results and the realization that his players don't like or respect him.
Mack is the complete opposite. Everybody is his friend or wants to be. He's like Ray Liotta in Goodfellas, walking around tipping everyone and making eyes light up with his mere presence. Mack can't get enough of the handshaking, back slapping and hugs. His social IQ is off the charts. He connects with kids and alumni like no other coach in D1 football. The championship and wins are really just gravy.
I say give him another million. The t-shirt sales alone should pay for it.
by EYESofBEVO on Jan 30, 2006 2:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
A Thoughtful Post
As fans we sometimes go with the collective thought that usually has a little too much emotion and not enough logic.
I think Coach Brown's Charisma is in his calm approach. By contrast Coach Carroll's is in his enthusiasm.
Both fit for their respective programs.
I can understand how the fans constantly called for his and Coach Davis' head. I know how I felt having to put up with the likes of Larry Smith, Ted Tolner and Paul Hackett, as a Jets fan you can imagine my disgust when Hackett was the Jets OC, talk about insult to injury.
UT, like SC has a lot to be thankful for. We've got coaches that are a good fit for our respective programs. We have it better than most. I can't speak for aTm, but I can see how bad it could be by looking across town at ucla. We've both been there before and I hope we don't see it again for very long time.
by Paragon SC on Jan 30, 2006 9:34 PM CST reply actions 0 recs



























