Burnt Orange Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Found Shot to Death


Texas A&M Breakdown: Offense

This isn't going to be much fun...

Quarterback It's tough to grade out Colt on Saturday's game, for a number of reasons. First, he's had just an unbelievable season for us. He's exceeded even the most optimistic of projections and delivered a monster first season to this team. Second, he was carted off the field on a stretcher. (The Texas athletics site reports that McCoy suffered a pinched nerve and is expected to recover fully.) Third, he appeared to be playing injured from the get-go yesterday.

It's that last point that gets at the heart of the matter. Other than the first drive, in which McCoy completed 5-of-5 for 66 yards, he appeared to be very uncomfortable on all his throws. McCoy would complete just 12 of his next 23 passes, throwing three interceptions in the process. What was most mystifying was the manner of the interceptions - they simply weren't the kinds of throws that Colt McCoy makes. He was throwing off his back foot, not stepping into his throws, and pushing the ball - rather than throwing it. In short: he looked injured.

I don't know if that pinched nerve became more bothersome as the game went on, or if it was bad from the very beginning, but it was clear that something was wrong. This isn't a case of Sunday Morning Quarterbacking, either. At halftime, I wrote, "Colt doesn't look totally comfortable yet. Not sure if it's rust or if he's still hurting a bit."

After watching the second half, it was clear that it was the latter. All three interceptions, I think, can be directly attributed to his injury. And that brings up an interesting question about the coaching, which we'll address later: how much did the coaches know about Colt's injury, and did they make a mistake by playing Colt Saturday? I'm not sure we're going to ever get enough information to answer that question with complete certainty, but I feel pretty comfortable saying - just based on observation - that a mistake was made. Something was wrong with Colt McCoy yesterday - even before the two nasty blows in the 4th quarter that finally knocked him out of the game. The coaches have a lot of explaining to do, though I suspect we won't get any.

For Colt, what a tough way to end his first regular season. His overall grade for the season is going to be a marvelous one, but for Saturday, it was a bad day. If he was hurt, he should have spoken up. Grade: D.

Running Backs 25 carries. 90 yards. At the University of Texas. In a game in which our quarterback was clearly well off his game, if not outright playing injured.

The running game clearly gets an F. The question is how much blame to place on the tailbacks? In other words, was it a problem of scheme or a problem of execution? It was a bit of both, actually, and let's start with the execution.



Henry Melton: F-

I don't want to ever see Henry Melton carry the football again.

If you have tape of the game, watch the 4th and 1 run to Melton. We all know that he didn't make it, but what you'll notice if you watch the replay is that Melton had a clear path to the first down, if not end zone, had he run straight ahead. But no... as only Henry can do, he bounced to the outside, right into trouble, and was dropped for a loss. Unbelievably awful run. The blocks in the middle were there. He just blew it. No two ways about it. No. More. Henry. Melton.

Ever.

As for Charles and Young, they were only mildly effective. Once more, though, they were often stuck in neutral as the defense came bearing down on them. Yesterday's problem was one of scheme, not execution. The tailbacks had little room to run, unfortunately. Greg Davis did make some adjustments in the second half, with better results, but it still wasn't enough. Davis put Colt under center more often in the second half, but without a credible passing threat (because of Colt's injury), the Texas running game was only average. Texas needed to establish a power running game yesterday. I'm not sure you can credibly say that this group of athletes isn't capable of running that way, but they've not done it this year. It's one of the tradeoffs of the offensive system Davis has used this year. That system, effective when Colt was healthy and on his game, failed miserably when the passing game wasn't able to be the primary focus. Grade: F

Receivers There's not much blame for the receivers here. They didn't drop passes, they got open down the field, and they blocked well. Colt just couldn't find them down the field. There's nothing else to say, unfortunately. Grade: Incomplete

Offensive Line Adam Ulatoski's going to be a good tackle. I really think so. But my goodness he's had a shaky second half of this season. He was a problem once again Saturday, both with blocking and with his devastating false start penalty on Texas' opening drive. Facing 2nd down and 3 to go from the Aggie 10, Ulatoski flinched and the rest is history.

The line was otherwise decent, but they hardly dominated the Aggies like they needed to. The fact of the matter is that this line excelled as a blocking unit for the Vince Young offense. They've done a good job this season pass blocking for Colt McCoy. But the tradeoff has been that they don't do very well in power run blocking. Once again, it's probably not a matter of them being incapable of it. It's just a matter of scheme and tendency. And that was a big problem for Texas yesterday when it became clear Colt couldn't get the ball down the field. Grade: D

Offensive Coaching Folks that want Greg Davis fired are going too far. The expectations some Texas fans have are simply stratospheric. And unrealistic. And unfair. No one praises Davis for all the wonderful things he does. They just wait for the bad games and go bananas.

We won't do that here. We like Greg Davis on the whole. So let's get that on the official record.

With that said, we'll be the first to concede that Davis laid an egg yesterday. A truly awful, terrible, rotten smelly egg. Just his worst game since the 2004 Red River Shootout. It's debatable whether McCoy should have been playing at all, but it's unquestionable that he was bordering on "totally ineffective" very early on this game. Certainly before halftime. And it's incumbent on Greg Davis, Quarterbacks Coach, to pick up on that. And it's incumbent on Greg Davis, Offensive Coordinator, to adjust accordingly.

And he, and Texas, didn't. There was some attempt in the second half to use more running, but when Texas should have been taking a play out of Texas A&M's playbook and running on virtually every down, Davis still tried (in vain) to maintain some semblance of balance. And that's one of the two biggest reasons why we lost. Sorry, Greg - this week, you deserve most of the flak you're going to get. Grade: F

Next up: the defense.

--PB--

0 recs | Comment 28 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Truly terrible game...
As I'm reading your grade-out of the offense, I find myself asking "Did this game really happen?"  I didnt think I could feel more depressed about a Texas loss than I did two weeks ago.  
Joe John Finley?

by bendj on Nov 25, 2006 11:13 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Melton
Not sure why everybody is so hard on Melton.  First of all, there was no hole on the 4th down play.  Had he run straight ahead, there was #11 from the Aggies bearing down to tag him in the backfield from the left side.  The problem is that when they bring him in it's like sending a telegram to the Aggie D that he's gonna get the ball on short yardage.

We've seen him look GREAT last year when he's in the flow of the regular offense.  If they used him like A&M used Lane all year then we only have one loss.

Perhaps mixing in a play action pass to a TE would have been a much better call or maybe even a quick handoff to a FB.

by DC Horn on Nov 25, 2006 11:55 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No way
There was a hole right over the right tackle. He bounced well outside the tackle, into trouble.

And, seriously, did you watch him against Sammy State? If you can't gain more than 3 yards per against Samuel H. Houston State University, you're not much use.

Stick him at defensive end and see if he can succeed there. I'd rather see Ogbonnaya on short yardage.

by PB @ BON on Nov 25, 2006 11:57 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Strange
Ogbonnaya does everything right and plays with great technique.
Melton spends an entire season getting it all wrong, flopping against SHSU -- and fumbling his chances since then.

So the coaches still stick him in. After a while you can't keep blaming Melton.
The decision to use him falls completely on the coaches.

Another question to ponder is, when do they ponder playing Kindle at RB?
Kelson made the transition to LB faster than Kindle, so at this point you can't use the inexperience excuse for him not seeing the field. It will be interesting to see how long they give him next season before giving the hook.

The roster usage this year has been truly bizarre. I don't know if Mack is just working towards the future or what is going on.

Cats and dogs sleeping together.

by EYESofBEVO on Nov 25, 2006 12:47 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree
Other teams are having success rotating in fresh legs, why cant we, with all of our seniors leaving this year why havent we heard from some of those great recruits weve been getting year after year?  I know the seniors deserve to get playing time and need to be there to lead the team but what about next year?

by lalonghorn on Nov 25, 2006 11:22 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Out of the Fiesta Bowl into the Toilet Bowl
Give credit to the Aggies for coming into our stadium with a lot of heart and leaving it all on the field in a incredulous win.

Are we distined for mediocrity again without the magic of Vince Young? Thirty years of not being able to win the big game may be back in the cards again. For all of Coach Brown's accolades, his record in winning a conference championship is as dismal as it gets. The reasons are probably too long to list:

  1. Poor offensive scheme - lay it on the GD doorstep. Without the improvision of VY we would never have won last year. Coach Brown said it best, "when we left (VY) alone, he started to perform".
  2. Poor offensive scheme - further evidence. How does Texas with arguably the best offensive line in college football and two good running backs not have a running game? It is again inquisition of the GD offense.
  3. No fullback - how does Texas not recruit a top notch power back? We have to take a defensive lineman to find someone who can make a yard. Henry Melton should be thrown out with the bathwater. He is totally inept at short yardage.
  4. Blind allegance - Coach Brown living with his poor offensive play calling and a lousy offensive scheme. Not pulling a clearly ailing Colt McCoy at halftime and bringing in Jevan Snead. My 84 year old mother called me today and asked what was he thinking in not replacing McCoy at halftime.
  5. Mediocrity - Coach Brown's recruiting record is steller, but let's face the facts. Every year he can take the top recruiting class in the state of Texas and turn it into a mediocre underacheiving team. He distinctly lacks the ability to inspire the team or to kick butt when needed. All we get is the usual COACHSPEAK - 'first let me say what a great win for Kansas State....and Texas A&M". They knocked us out of the Fiesta Bowl into the Toilet Bowl.

by valonghorn on Nov 25, 2006 12:19 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Noooo
Look, guys: the season ended when McCoy got hurt versus Kansas State. He stays in that game, we win it. No doubt in my mind. Same for yesterday's game. He was still hurt.

That happens, and we're all watching on the edge of our seats today to see if we sneak into the BCS Title Game.

This team was very tough this year with a healthy McCoy. The secondary let us down, yes, but this was a very strong team overall. We beat Oklahoma, and are in great position for next season as well. All the key offensive players return, and there are some outstanding offensive line prospects waiting in the wings.

I'd wager a lot of money that we'll retool the offense over the offseason, too. Don't forget that most folks, including the coaches, thought we'd have one more year of VY. There wasn't much time to reinvent the offense with a redshirt freshman quarterback. You just don't do that.

Mack Brown deserves shit for the team's performance yesterday. But let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater. Big mistake.

by PB @ BON on Nov 25, 2006 12:22 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Who are we kidding-Snead Rocked at KState
How can you say that Mccoy would have won the game at KState.  Snead walks in, never played a college game, and scores 35 points.  Then Colt decides to play, even though he was clearly hurt, and did not have himself removed for the good of the team.  Pretty selfish.  Then Mack Brown does not pull him when it is clear that he is not performing, whatever the reason.  Sounds like  Bledsoe and the Cowboys.  Any reasonably intelligent person could have seen VY going to the Pros,but the ostrich head coach does nothing to prepare for it.  Can you imagine Charlie Weiss or Carroll with this consistently amazing recruiting class.  He gets one of the best quarterbacks in the country in Snead, then fails to utilize him.  Wow for winning at OU, clearly that does not compensate for Ohio State and A&M.  The defense owns the loss at KState.  Again, anyone hear comments about the NFL for Colt Mccoy, No.  We do hear them about Snead on a regular basis.  What will it take.  If Snead leaves, then we are just left with Mccoy.  I feel better already.

by skycaptain123 on Nov 25, 2006 2:42 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Brown shuts barn door after...
There is an article on today's Houston Chronicle web-site, "Brown wants answers on running game." "We need to re-evaluate why we're not getting longer [running] plays," Brown said.  You think so, Mack?  But don't you think it is a little too late?  While you are at it, evaluate why you are not getting longer pass plays.  (Love that flanker screen).  Maybe they will "fix" it enough to get a couple of 20-yarders against some 6-5 team in a mediocre bowl.  
"Only angry people win football games." --DKR

by OBdoc on Nov 25, 2006 4:50 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Fixing the running game
While Mack is trying to figure out why they can't break any long runs, he also needs to figure out why they can't make thrid and 1, fourth and inches, etc., inside the red zone (without injuring the QB)
"Only angry people win football games." --DKR

by OBdoc on Nov 26, 2006 1:33 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Colt
Why give Colt a pass?  He looked fine physically to me.  He just threw terrible passes under pressure.  Snead might be a better fit for the offense...we'll see how it goes this spring.

The offense running scheme is (as usual) predictable and ordinary.  What was the longest run for the year?  I bet it wasn't over 25 yards.  That sideline trap running scheme is good for 3-8 yards consistently, but it puts too much pressure on the offense if one of the plays don't work.

The most dangerous weapons on the offense is our receiving corp so if GD really wanted to march down the field, we'd be throwing the ball a lot more on first down.

by DC Horn on Nov 25, 2006 12:38 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Half right
You're absolutely right about the running game.

And dead wrong on Colt. He looked fine to you? Really? He looked nothing like the guy who'd been shredding the Big 12 prior to his injury. There's simply no way you can evaluate Colt without taking that injury into account. Nor can you deny how good he'd been up to that injury. I'm praying for a full recovery; he can be an elite college quarterback.

by PB @ BON on Nov 25, 2006 12:40 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree to disagree
Colt is and should still be the starting QB, we saw more shock and awe and pure leadership from Colt than any team should hope to see.  Colt was off Friday because of the injury.  Ive watched nearly every game, and game after game i was more impressed, bunk that, mystified by his ability to withstand and avoid pressure.  Did anyone else see the block he put on the LB in the TX Tech game on the screen play?!?!?  Hes MajorA reincarnate with a hellacious throwing arm.  Snead should honor his commitment and stay with Tx and he will get his playing time, heck redshirt a year and he will pick up when Colt leaves for a year.  Maybe thats too much to ask.

by lalonghorn on Nov 25, 2006 11:30 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hellacious Throwing ARM?????
Who are we kidding.  Recruiting classes and champions come from kids able to make it in the NFL.  Major is probably a great person, and was a reasonably good college quarterback, but no championships came from his arm or his leadership.  Snead has that potential, just like Vince and Leinart have that potential.  Why keep him out, instead of letting him play.  I have no doubt that Snead would have played at or better than mccoy this year, and we would have been in better shape for next year.

by skycaptain123 on Nov 26, 2006 11:43 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I beginning to think......
Skycaptain is Sneads dad......  Although i do agree, Snead did have a promising game against KState.  It wasnt a great performance but it showed potential.  And im sure well see in the spring.  McCoy rallied this year, not could have but DID.  Snead threw a few INT's and showed his inability to be prepared for the possibility of playing.  I think he had his mind on leaving UT a little too much, and maybe still does.

by lalonghorn on Nov 26, 2006 3:15 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Crazy talk
Snead played decently against Kansas State; let's not get carried away. Snead has plenty of talent, but how quickly folks are forgetting how good McCoy was this season.

by PB @ BON on Nov 26, 2006 3:24 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hey, we didnt get blown out....
Thats the reason for my observation that he played decent.  The passes were off and he didnt escape pressure like McCoy for he did calm down and start throwing the ball right.  But McCoy as far as im concerned showed pure brilliance (see my other comments on Colt)this season.  Heres to the 2007 Heisman campaign!!

by lalonghorn on Nov 26, 2006 3:30 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No
I was addressing Skycaptain. I thought Snead did fine, but the idea that he's shown the ability to be as good as McCoy was when healthy this season is totally without base.

What's in question is how this injury affects McCoy. It might be one of those injuries that lingers and bothers his throwing motion from here on out. I've had a friend who had a pinched nerve injury in high school football, and it bothers him to this day.

We'll see.

by PB @ BON on Nov 26, 2006 3:32 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ha Ha Ha, Very Cute
My point is that Mccoy is a good college quarterback, but will never be great.  By great, I mean a national championship and probable pro potential.  Now, I don't know if Snead would get there either, but I truly believe he has the potential.  And No, Snead is not my son, lets not make this personal, stay with the players.

by skycaptain123 on Nov 26, 2006 6:51 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If Colt is going to lose the starting job
because of an injury or the starting job becomes open, then it should be open to everyone.

They shouldn't just flip a switch, move the conveyor belt and use Snead because he's next in line.
Even though he has playing time, I would still like to see Harris and others in the mix.

All this is moot if Colt returns healthy and back on track. But if for some reason he doesn't, they should let the best man win.

Cats and dogs sleeping together.

by EYESofBEVO on Nov 25, 2006 12:52 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Colt
You guys are giving him a pass for having a horrible game.  He was pressured threw some BS passes.  He had zip on the ball (not that he has the strongest arm anyway).  He's not coming up with excuses so why should we?

Don't get me wrong, I'm a big fan of the kid, but he had a horrible game.  My point on Snead is that I like him too and am wondering if he'll be given a 'real' opportunity to win the job next year.

On another note, I pray to God that both of our tackles get a lot better next year.  Otherwise it's gonna be rough for the next few years considering the middle of the line is gone.

by DC Horn on Nov 25, 2006 2:04 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Breakdown: Offense
Great overall analysis.  I agree that Greg Davis gets ignored when we win and roasted when we lose.  If Davis should have realized McCoy was hurting, shouldn't Brown, who was on the sidelines and could have talked with him, have realized the problem?  How do we know Davis wasn't overruled by Brown on any number of things, from QB to play-calling?  Regardless, the buck has to stop with Brown, not Davis.

However, I do disagree with the play-calling in the fourth quarter with us ahead.  We were moving the ball on the gound exclusively, when Davis decides to pass.  You don't have to break long runs to be effective.  So long as you don't have a sack, incompletion, or penalty, you only have to average 3.5 yards a carry, less in 4-down territory. When you are moving the ball on the ground, even in 3 or 4 yard chunks, you don't need to pass just to be "balanced" or keep the defense honest.  Go back to Ohio State and all may have been different had they just stuck to a ground attack that was working.  As far as not breaking off any long runs yesterday, might Young and Charles been running more conservatively after they took so much heat for their fumbles in the KS game?

Finally, regarding Henry Melton, he apparently has been out of favor with the coaches and has rarely played offensively all year.  Can anyone offer any theory why he would be inserted for a critical play in one of the most important games of the year?  And Henry, if you ever get the ball again, remember that old saying from math: the shortest distance between two points is a straight line.  

"Only angry people win football games." --DKR

by OBdoc on Nov 25, 2006 2:15 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Colt, Melton, and Davis
Colt was noticeably still injured. He DID NOT have "zip" on the ball. That being said, I thought he made decent choices but his arm was not what he thought it was. Don't get me wrong, he made some mistakes too. The most important one being not telling anybody he wasnt 100%, or even 80% for that matter.

The Breakdown on Melton is 100% accurate. How does a 272 lb RB (RB not Fullback) fail to make 6 inches. It might be different if there was no hole and he gets swallowed in the backfield by 1 or 2 DT's. BUT NO. The kid gets PUNKED 1 on 1 by a linebacker. Not just tackled, he got Steve Atwatered. Melton does not lower his shoulder and he should not get any more carries. I'd argue to make him a defensive lineman, but he seems afraid to take a hit.

I also dont see why we should give him regular carries in the normal offense. He doesnt run out of the shotgun nearly as good as Selvin or Jamaal and definitely can't secure the ball any better. If a 272 lb RB cant make 6 inches, he needs to be a Defensive End. Period.

Anybody remember the 4th and goal play last year vs tOSU. Score a TD Henry, and we seal the game for sure. What does he do? Slows down, heads to the corner, dives, and gets shoved out by a 192 lb corner. Are you serious?

100% Accurate. No more touches for Melton. Ever.

Greg Davis does not get a pass. He also doesnt get ignored when we win. I remember reading quite a bit of "what the hell is GD thinking" posts on our wins too.

Here's the thing. Snead obviously fits better in our Zone Read offense, but he's not the best QB on the team. Colt is the best QB, so he needs to be starting (when healthy) weekly.

That being said, GD needs to change it up. Raise your hands. How many people thought it was silly that UT ran the exact same offense with Matt Nordgren in the O last year, when Vince went to the bench in garbage time? Everybody? Yah, me too. This concept of keeping the exact same offense no matter who is taking the snaps is ridiculous.

The fact of the matter is, we run better out of single back formation when Colt is under center. Unfortunately, Colt passes better when in shotgun. I will give GD a pass for not purely running out of single back and passing out of shotgun, due to obvious reasons. What we need to do is run more NORTH/SOUTH, Greg Davis! And we can still do that out of the shotgun. This would allow for the same Run/Pass flexibility and we could wear down defenses better. Also, with the added dimension, our 95% east/west style could be more effective. Now opposing linebackers just have to slide from side to side to limit our RB tandem to 3-8 yard pops. Let's keep them on their toes. This would open up the "Explosive Plays" and we would see more bang for our "Zone Read" buck.

And yes, the Buck stops with Mack Brown. He's an incredible recruiter AND COACH. But he's just not cut throat enough. Colt wanted to play, and apparently seemed healthy enough in the 2 week lay-off to convince Mack of the same. Coach Brown likely realized Colt wasnt 100% a few plays too late. Colt looked good enough to fool him.

The buck stops with you, Coach Brown. Make Duane Akina and (if we still have him) Gene Chizik turn Henry Melton into a DL in the Spring. No more Melton failing on 2nd, 3rd and especially not 4th and inches. We get 4th down and 6 inches. I see Melton in the backfield. All I say is "He's a bitch. Unless he doesnt get hit, he's not going to make it."

The buck stops with you, Coach Brown. Fire Greg Davis. Please. The least you can do, is go out and get an co-offensive coordinator. I'm not saying GD is 100% wrong in what he does. But the guy is flat out stubborn. He is too conservative at the wrong times and God help me if I see another WR screen. The guy should have been fired in 2004, but Vince Young saved his job. It should no longer be secure. Please, Coach Brown, please.

by bleed burnt orange on Nov 25, 2006 8:03 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Short Yardage Back
The season was destroyed at K-state, in the first drive, during the goal line series.

Lots of "what ifs?"

What if.....the lousy refs had made the right call (touchdown)?

What if.....Colt is not forced to take the ball in himself?

What if.....we had a decent short yardage back?

We'd have a healthy quaterback, at least one more win in the regular season, and a shot at the Big 12 championship.

What cost us the game is Texas' inept short yardage play. It has been a problem since Lokey broke. As good as Charles and Young are, I hated the Texas rungame almost all season. There is a time and place for finnesse, but every play? What was wrong with putting two in the backfield, making some lanes, and running between the tackles? I was just so sick of watching Young and Charles dance around behind the line.

Mac is worried about long yards? They couldn't even get one, when they really needed it.

by HorseyTruck on Nov 25, 2006 8:35 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Something Positive
Jermichael Finley is a stud. I look forward to seeing him play next year.

by HorseyTruck on Nov 25, 2006 8:58 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Finley
True, but that's what I felt about Charles and Sweed and Melton (and Ramonce Taylor) this year.  Does it seem that more players at UT don't live up to their potential than at other schools?  
"Only angry people win football games." --DKR

by OBdoc on Nov 26, 2006 1:39 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No
You just don't hear about the other teams' busts because you don't live and die with the news of their players. It's natural to think that your teams problems are unique, but they aren't.

Everyone needs to keep things in perspective here.

by PB @ BON on Nov 26, 2006 1:46 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Offensive Scheme is PITIFUL!
We can recruit better athletes than Army and The Citadel could ever imagine (hell our second team could beat both teams combined).  So how is that and we can only muster up 70 yards rushing against the Aggies when Army goes for 186 and The Citadel goes for 115.  GD's play calling is terrible, worse in the NCAA.  I have seen Class A (High School) teams with a better scheme!

NO MORE HENRY MELTON!

by utfan1970 on Nov 28, 2006 10:05 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.
Start posting about the Longhorns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Top 10 Games of the Mack Brown Era

Recent FanPosts

Me_small
Favorite Wash-outs
Small
Most Underrated Plays in the Mack Brown Era
Small
The Kindle Conundrum
Small
Fiercest Rivalry and Texas preview
Small
NCAA 2010 Player Ratings
Jack_small
Saving Grace
Brandedbevo1024x768_small
Free event with Brown and coaching staff
Brandedbevo1024x768_small
Texas Gridiron Kick-Off
Bevo_small
Let us debate.

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Site Editors

Pb6_small PB @ BON

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Contributing Authors

Jersey_front_small 54b

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Small whills

Menbooger_small GhostofBigRoy

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Official Partner of CBS Sports