I'm Better Than You Are And I Know It
Our loyal reader and ambiguous fan UCLAwarren got me thinking when he took on The King of the NBA, Michael Jordan. Well, really he just said he didn't like him and that he took offense to Jordan's cocky attitude. After briefly defending Jordan, while (of course) slipping in the pleasure I derive from watching Barry Bonds play, it got me to thinking about cocky, supremely talented players in sports.
I love them. I wish there were more of them. Now, before you get all uppity, hear me out.
Who would you rather have on your team in their prime: Barry Bonds or Alex Rodriguez? Michael Jordan or Kobe Bryant? Vince Young or Chris Simms? I don't know about you, but I'll take Bonds, Jordan and Vince every day of the week and twice on Sunday.
Why do people care if these guys are pricks to the media? Why do people care if they say crazy things like "We're gangsta." Why do people want someone who acts like Cal Ripken when they can get someone who mashes like Barry Bonds? Please don't give me that role model crap. That's a parent's job, not an athlete's.
The point I want to make, though, is that the athletes I'm advocating win because they know they're the best. Jordan absolutely dominated his opponents, not only with his game, but with his mind. That attitude was as important to his success as any physical talents he was blessed with. Vince Young? I think we can all attest to there being a VY attitude, and I don't think there's one person in Texas who'd trade away that championship for someone a little more, uh, mainstream, for lack of a better word. My favorite anecdote from the season was the 4th and 30 play against Missouri. VY's got a little bit of that championship `tude. There's no mistaking why we won the Rose Bowl. It wasn't our affable coach, boys and girls.
One of my top ten favorite moments in my sports lifetime? Reggie Miller's miraculous, single-handed Knick slaying comeback, followed by the F YOU choke sign to Spike Lee. Of course, Reggie never got his ring because of that MJ fella, but you had to love that attitude. 8 points in 11 seconds.
And Bonds? He may not have a ring, but it's certainly not his fault. He's taken his team to the postseason seven times. In the 2002 postseason, if he didn't draw a walk, he hit a home run. Four in the World Series alone. So spare me the "choke" nonsense. Simply put, Bonds is the best hitter any of us have ever seen, and probably the best hitter to ever live. He strikes so much fear into opponents that he drew 232 walks in 2004. His on-base percentage: .609. Folks, you can go ahead and laser those in to the record books. Never gonna be topped. If OPS is your bag, he's got it covered, too. 1.422.
I'll never forget this SI cover from back in 1993.

He may not say it to the media, but I'll guarantee you that inside his head it's "I'm Vince Young and you're not."
So the media can have their darlings. I'll take the best.
Okay, I'm done. Flame away. Just don't wear a "We're Texas" shirt if you do. That would be arrogant. And we can't have that, now can we?
--PB--
0 recs |
21 comments
Comments
Let there be no ambiguity about it
And now back to your regularly scheduled blogging.
A Trojan can only be used once. A Bruin is forever.
by uclawarren on Mar 1, 2006 10:45 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Which makes no sense
Color me confused.
by Peter Bean on Mar 1, 2006 10:54 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
http://www.ncaa.org/champadmin/champs_listing1.html
Total Championships:
UCLA: 97
Texas: 38
How about in their best sport:
Texas: Men's Swimming and Diving - 9
UCLA: Men's Volleyball - 18
(not to mention that UCLA also has more championships in Men's Tennis (16), Men's Basketball (11) and Women's Softball (10) than Texas has in any sport)
So you may have better teams in the big-money sports THIS year...but if you're into the whole "bandwagon" thing, that's just a shame.
A Trojan can only be used once. A Bruin is forever.
by uclawarren on Mar 1, 2006 11:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Just
by Peter Bean on Mar 1, 2006 12:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No worries
A Trojan can only be used once. A Bruin is forever.
by uclawarren on Mar 1, 2006 1:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Back when
by orbitboy on Mar 1, 2006 12:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It was 66-3
A Trojan can only be used once. A Bruin is forever.
by uclawarren on Mar 1, 2006 1:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ken, Michael, Vince
By the way, if we're talking about prime, I'll take Junior Griffey.
by Lincoln on Mar 1, 2006 10:54 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Griffey is no Bonds
And Bonds, despite whatever you have been led to believe by aforementioned media that effing hates the guy, got big and strong by (like Jordan) being the most ridiculously hard working player in the major leagues. Bonds is not the greatest hitter ever because of steroids. It's a ridiculous argument. Totally ridiculous. Sammy Sosa (may have) hit lots of home runs because of steroids. Sammy Sosa is -not- the hitter Barry Bonds is. This goes waaaaay beyond home runs.
Did you ever think that the media that hates Bonds might be guiding the way you're thinking about him? Have you done any serious reading on the guy to determine why he's as good as he is, or why he's as big and strong as he is?
Never mind the fact that steroids weren't even banned in the game until 2003. Many argue that amphetamines are a far bigger help to a player than steroids ever could be. Not to mention the fact that steroids have ruined many, many more players careers than they have supposedly helped. Think Jason Giambi regrest taking `roids? As soon as he did, he tanked.
Anyway, I knew all this was coming. We can keep going if you'd care to. But no matter what you -choose- to believe, Bonds is the best hitter that ever lived. It's a shame so many people missed the show.
by Peter Bean on Mar 1, 2006 11:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention
It's craziness to try to taint Bonds' performance with the steroid speculations. He's never failed a drug test and in 2004, with the full drug policy in place, he batted .362 with a .609 OBP, while slugging .812. Meanwhile, other sluggers that were "steroid tainted" fell off a cliff.
Hmmm...
Maybe saying he is what he is because of steroids is a stupid thing to say.
Sorry, it's not personal Lincoln. I just get angry (and saddened) when people piss on Bonds. He may have brought it on himself to some extent, but it's still a shame.
by Peter Bean on Mar 1, 2006 11:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bonds
By the way, if you think MJ's teammates were nobodies (like Kobe's are this year), consider that he had Pippen (one of the NBA's 50 Greatest), Rodman (one of the best rebounders of all time), and Kerr (the leading 3-point shooter, accuracy-wise, of all time), so saying that MJ did as much carrying of his team in the 90s as Kobe has to this year is ridiculous. Even Horace Grant and John Paxson played better than who Kobe has had since last year (and that includes the underachieving Lamar Odom...I'm not saying they were better players, but they did play better than Odom on those teams). When MJ was playing in the 80s, he managed to get to the first round, but couldn't really get much further than that. In his years before Pippen got there, he got to the playoffs twice and lost both times in the 1st round. So, I don't really think Kobe is very far behind were Jordan was.
A Trojan can only be used once. A Bruin is forever.
by uclawarren on Mar 1, 2006 12:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Jordan makes the whole team better
by Wells on Mar 1, 2006 6:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I could write paragraphs and pages to the contrary
by Lincoln on Mar 1, 2006 6:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: I'm Better Than You Are And I Know It
As far as the criticism Vince is getting right now, all I have to say is "Underestimate him at yor own peril." Is he the next Jordan or Bonds? Time will tell. I'm not going to predict that, but I'm not going to bet against it, either. I retired from the "Vince-doubter-club" a long time ago.
One last thing--being a Giants/Longhorn fan in the 90's was always equally exciting and heartbreaking. Now it the Giants' turn, dammit!
by orbitboy on Mar 1, 2006 11:30 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Glimmer of hope
A bit of hope for you: I suffered through years and years of no titles from my teams.
Then...
Texas wins the Rose Bowl.
Steelers win the Super Bowl.
So maybe this IS my year. And hopefully, Barry's year.
by Peter Bean on Mar 1, 2006 11:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
In my case
I'll tell you this much: I was living in San Francisco in 1993, when the 'Pokes beat the 49ers and won the Superbowl. There is no feeling quite like walking around SF wearing an obnoxious Cowboy Super bowl champs t-shirt. Like I said, I'm paying now....but those smug 49ers fans had it coming big time.
by orbitboy on Mar 1, 2006 11:44 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Smug
A Trojan can only be used once. A Bruin is forever.
by uclawarren on Mar 1, 2006 1:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No, I remember very distinctly
49ers fans = smug
Cowboy fans = obnoxious
Think Joe Montana vs. Michael Irvin.
or
Eddie DeBartolo vs. Jerry Jones.
or
George Seifert vs. Jimmy Johnson.
by orbitboy on Mar 1, 2006 2:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
A Trojan can only be used once. A Bruin is forever.
by uclawarren on Mar 1, 2006 2:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Pinstripe Bible
by tk on Mar 1, 2006 12:48 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Outstanding
Sigh... It's sad: people are missing the greatest hitting show ever to walk the earth.
Tune in people. You might never get a chance to see someone this good again.
by Peter Bean on Mar 1, 2006 12:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs



























