Mack Brown and Bowl Games: The 2001 Season (Part 1 of 3)
As much as we'd all like to forget the 2001 season, it was an important one for Texas, and we'd might as well get it over with.
Let's open this boldly: the 2001 Longhorns should have won the national championship. And now let's get realistic: the 2001 Longhorns were a great, but not elite, team. Because of the way the season so disastrously ended against Colorado, where we almost backdoored our way into the title game, the (mis)perception was that Texas a national title contender.
They were nominally, but not quite realistically. Miami, LSU, Nebraska, and Oregon, just to name four teams, were all better than Texas. You could easily argue that Tennessee and Oklahoma were, too. The Sooners weren't a great offensive team in 2001, but they had a tremendous defense. Anyway, the point is that Texas was "merely" a Top 10 team, and even had we beaten Colorado in the Big 12 title game, we had no business playing in the Rose Bowl. So let's just agree on that before we move on.
The strength of the 2001 team was a reasonably balanced offensive attack coupled with a stingy defense, especially in the secondary. Statistically, the 2001 Longhorn defense was a touch better than the 2005 national championship squad, though part of that is because the 2005 title winners blew everyone out and gave up garbage yards in half their games. Regardless, the secondary of Ahmad Brooks, Quentin Jammer, Nathan Vasher, and Roderick Babers, was a solid group. Vasher, especially, had terrific instincts at strong safety and led the team with 7 interceptions.
While statistically strong, the 2001 defense was not without flaws. Babers was wildly overrated as a cover corner, and the defensive line was adjusting to life without Hampton and Rogers. Derek Johnson was strong his freshman year at linebacker, but the unit as a whole was only slightly above average. The last two games against Colorado and Washington, as we saw, exposed the weaknesses in the Horns defense.
The real story of 2001 was the offense, though. The big story - the one that dominated every angle of every story - was that freaking quarterback controversy. Now, this isn't going to be popular, but I think Mack Brown was right to go to Simms. Hear me out on this one.
Major Applewhite had a God-like reputation among Texas fans, some of which he deserved, some of which he did not. Major was a better than average quarterback who played above his natural abilities, and deserves lots of credit for his guts and heart. But his ceiling was nowhere near Chris Simms'.
And his track record wasn't without blemish to begin with. Applewhite had passed for a middle of the road 135.9 passer rating in 2000. That year he was a problem against Stanford, and ineffective against Oklahoma. Pure and simple, his reputation as a gamer exceeded his ability to be a national title quarterback, no matter what the fans may have thought.
(Parenthetically, in the long-term, it was probably best for Major to have events unfold as they did. The blame for 2001's losses fell squarely on Simms and cemented Applewhite's legacy as Hero. His odds of becoming the head coach of the University of Texas Longhorns are somewhere between 90% and 100%. Don't feel too bad for the kid.)
The problem was that Simms wasn't a national title quarterback, either. In part because of his own limitations, and in part because our coaches didn't do a great job with him, he consistently had his worst games in the most important contests of the season. Some of that you have to be born with, but some of it can be coached. Simms definitely lacked the natural leadership abilities and killer instinct, and it can be argued that the coaches didn't do a good job teaching him, either. The excessively conservative game plans against Oklahoma doomed Simms, and the team, in both 2001 and 2002.

The 2001 season in a play.
In the end, the offense wasn't quite good enough, the defense was just porous enough, and the coaching was just conservative enough to keep this team from reaching its full potential. We'll break down each of the two disastrous losses in Part 2 of this series.
To come in Part 2: the Oklahoma and Colorado losses.
To come in Part 3: the 2001 Holiday Bowl.
--PB--
0 recs |
5 comments
Comments
Best for all of us, IMHO
Yes, 2001 turning out the way it did was probably good for Major, as you state.
2001 didn't do too much damage to Chris, in the long run, considering he's the starting QB for Tampa Bay and making big bucks.
But in the bigger scheme, I wonder if 2001 wasn't good for Texas, too? Would Mack have been able to land VY if Chris had had a perfect season and a National Championship? Would Horns fans have been happier about the season if we had beaten Colorado and gone on to get demolished by Miami instead of giving the Huskers that priviledge? Did Mack (and maybe even GD) learn a lesson about conservative game planning that paid off in 2005? Did the performance of the D in 2001 and 2002 lead to the Greg Robinson / Gene Chizik era that has so transformed the look of our defense and our success in recruiting defensive studs to complement the stars on the offensive side of the line?
I'm not saying these are all true, but I definetly feel the seeds of the 2005 MNC were sown in this season.
by patienthornsfan on Jun 21, 2006 1:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
agree mostly
LSU in 2001 was average at best. Florida was an awesome team that had two brain farts (one of which occured in a really wet game) against Auburn and Tennessee. At their best they could have ripped apart Texas and beaten Miami. But I think UT had a better team than anyone else, Oregon and Tennessee (both of which had a whole bunch of really close games) included. Oklahoma had a great defense but a bomar-level offense and would not have beaten Texas if the Mack Brown of today coached that game. Hell, if Texas had Mac McWhorter and Gene Chizik back then they would have been undefeated until the Rose Bowl.
Simms was one of the most underrated UT players of all time IMO. He flopped against colorado in the CCG, there is no question about that. But most of the other losses were not really his fault. The Oline pre-mcwhorter was never that good (despite being just as talented as today,) and the beloved Roy/BJ/Sloan WR core, as talented and great as it was, had a knack for getting hands of stone in big games. Everyone knows about the 2000 Holiday Bowl, but watch a tape of the '02 OU game if you want to see some terrible WR play. I remember like 3 perfect passes that got dropped by the wideout and then intercepted. I love Roy and BJ, I really do, but I'm not sure that I don't like Pittman and Sweed even more for the way the come up big when the team needs it most, even if they aren't as talented.
The D that year was a brick wall for 11 games. Don't know what happened in the two post season games. Thats something that always noticed about Reese's defenses. they put up great numbers, but would always have some games where they just didn't show up. I think the scheming was just much more simplified compared to the near NFL level Ds that Robinson and Chizik have brought. (hopefully Jerry Gray next whenenver Chizik takes a HC job)
The O was really good when Mack and GD didn't hold it back. The '05, '98, and '02 units were the only ones that were better in the Mack Brown era. 2001 was by far the most complete team prior to this last year. It didn't have any real major weaknesses (whereas 2002 had awful OL play, '04 had a weak passing game, and '98 had no defense.)
by Matt on Jun 21, 2006 2:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Mostly agree
*The point about the wide receivers is fair. The group last year, especially with Thomas sucking in everything, was just amazing.
*The defense wasn't quite as good as its reputation, I don't think. We faced a bunch of crappy offenses, and by the end of the year, we got exposed. The Washington game, in part, was just a letdown from CU, but Barnett figured out real quickly that you could run on us. That defense was a bit of a paper tiger.
by Peter Bean on Jun 21, 2006 3:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Major's last start
An absolute gem of a game to break my cherry on.
by chief on Jun 21, 2006 3:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice
by Peter Bean on Jun 21, 2006 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs


























