Burnt Orange Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Baby Boilers no more: Michigan State-Purdue Preview

2006 College Football Blog Awards: Dr. Z Award for Best Analysis

I've thought throughout this process that the Best Analysis Award was among the most interesting and prestigious of the twenty-two awards being presented this year. When Joel announced that the final votes had been tallied, I more or less insisted that I be given the opportunity to present this one.

Before I announce the 2006 winner and runner up, I'd like to talk a little bit about why.

As a complete and total(ly hopeless) sportsaholic, my fandom has been enhanced immeasurably by the wonderful advances of the internet age. The internet allowed for junkies like you and me to elevate our obsession by providing us with access to sports-related content beyond our local newspapers. In the early years of the internet age, misplaced fans were gifted the ability to read the local papers of his favorite team, or dive into writing and analysis from sports content behemoths like ESPN.com.

As technology continued to improve exponentially, access to online content became increasingly convenient and widespread. Along with reading content from big providers, likeminded individuals began gathering together in user-created message boards to discuss their interests. Inevitably, self-publishing became so easy that the era of individually run websites erupted. The fan has always had a voice, but now he has a platform from which to speak to hundreds, thousands, maybe even millions of fellow fans.

And that's a wonderful, wonderful thing, because as any serious sports junkie can tell you, the best analysis about our favorite teams comes from fellow fans. Our best sports conversations always involve other hopeless team devotees. Enter: bloggers, blogs, and the communities therein.

Without the strictures of conventional journalism to concern themselves with, bloggers are often more creative, unafraid to test big ideas, and less constrained by the requirement that they not over-challenge conventional wisdom. Without an editor assigning them stories they must write, bloggers dive into the topics they think would be most interesting. Often devoted exclusively to a single team or sport, bloggers wind up lording over their realm with far more authenticity and - I'd argue - authority, than any journalist paid to cover so many different teams and sports ever could.

The end result for the college football blogosphere? Delightful, inspired content and analysis like the BlogPoll. MaxwellPundit. Friday Morning Quarterback. The list is seemingly endless, and grows with each season as the army of impressive college football bloggers grows.

Sports blogs are wonderful because they provide a way for the fans of our favorite sports teams to speak. And in so doing, the market - in this case, information, analysis, and commentary - becomes more competitive. And when a market becomes more competitive, the quality improves. Instead of being forced to just read Beano Cook, you can now read Brian Cook. Or the pack of Irish writers at Blue-Gray Sky. Or any of this year's Dr. Z Award nominees for the best analysis.

Without further ado, that leads us to the award presentation.

The winner of the 2006 Dr. Z Award for Best Analysis is...

Star-divide


MGoBlog, written by Brian Cook!

The runner up, in a very tight vote, is Sunday Morning Quarterback!

The other finalists, listed in alphabetical order, were: Blue-Gray Sky, Burnt Orange Nation, DawgSports, and Mark May Be Wrong.

I wanted to write that longish introduction because these awards seek to highlight the outstanding work of college football's best bloggers, and I think the thing I love most about all this is the amazing analysis I get on a daily basis from all the blogs that I read.

And no one provides more, or better, analysis than Brian Cook at MGoBlog. I recall Brian writing at one time that his operating philosophy is to pick a niche and completely, totally, and thoroughly dominate it. Reading that, everything that Brian does came into clear focus. The exhaustive season previews. The advanced, video-enhanced pregame breakdowns of each of Michigan's opponents, and then, following the games, the play by play breakdowns of each contest. We do our best to spoil our Texas fans here at Burnt Orange Nation, but it's fair to say that MGoBlog is a gigantic slice of heaven for Wolverine football junkies.

Not that Brian stops there. His analysis extends to national stories, teams well outside Michigan's schedule, and issues germane to college football generally. I'm sure I speak for many, many bloggers when I say that I've worked hard to improve my own college football analysis simply to attempt to remain in the same neighborhood as that which Brian is providing. Weak analysis, in turn, is often digested by Brian, sent through the meat grinder which is his mind, and spit the hell out, if it's not up to par. Bad arguments and weak takes are systematically shredded, if Brian's deemed them sufficiently interesting enough to comment on. If he weren't so busy making such a good sports blogger, and had even an iota of interest in it, he'd undoubtedly make for one hell of an elite lawyer.

The standards for cogent, interesting analysis in the college football blogosphere are set by Brian at MGoBlog. And just think: I haven't even mentioned the BlogPoll yet. That's a conscious choice, by the way. Even if the BlogPoll didn't exist, Brian would be deserving of this award.

No need to take my word for it, either. Awe for Brian's work extends well beyond these pages. Maize N Brew's Dave writes:

Brian's piece on third down efficiency was one of the coolest things I've ever seen statistics applied to. MGoBlog consistently goes above and beyond the call of duty in researching some of the most important and most interesting aspects of college football, offers insightful opinions in flowing prose, then supports them with Fields Medal worthy statistical data. He gets nod number one.

Elsewhere, Johnny from RBUAS writes:

It should be noted that had I not been sent a link to one of Brian’s Upon Further Review entries during the 2005 season, I probably would not have a blog. His Third Down Efficiency expedition could blow dandruff off a man’s scalp.

So let me conclude by saying: Brian - congratulations, and thank you for all your fine work.


I do want to conclude with some nice words about this year's runner up, the Sunday Morning Quarterback. We know that SMQ won't be satisfied with any second place moral victories here, but hopefully I can assure him that his talents are as thoroughly enjoyed as those of any blogger around. There may not exist a blogger more universally appreciated and enjoyed by fellow bloggers, in fact, which explains his many nominations in these awards, and strong finish in every category for which he was nominated.

His Friday and Sunday Morning Quarterback features are the most rewarding reads of many of our weeks. We shake our heads in awe while reading them, thinking, "I wish I could comment so insightfully on so many different teams and topics." It's truly marvelous, and inspired me to write the comment that is quoted on his site:

How much football does he watch? Dude's got insights on everybody - and by everybody, I mean everybody. Throw in some of the best writing in the blogosphere, and we're talking about a daily must-read.

Yeah. That pretty much says it: an insatiable appetite for all things college football, a supremely developed analytical mind, and elite writing. That's a winning formula.


Congratulations to all of this year's nominees for the Dr. Z Award!

The next award presentation will be in one hour, at 11:00 a.m. eastern time, at DawgSports.

--PB--

0 recs  |  Comment 8 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

How could it be anyone else
The man breaks down every single play.
As a UT fan I am envious.  Michigan fans, appreciate what you have.

by Wells on Jan 31, 2007 9:12 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

i don't know
Maybe I'll come off sounding like a jerk here.  It's bad enough these awards exist, but this long rollout of each winner is too much and feels like a ploy to spread out site hits.  It's one thing to link to sites, quite another to force the issue.

Anyway, sorry, but wake me when it's all over.

by Jason Mayer on Jan 31, 2007 10:38 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Your entitled to feel that way...
...but couldn't be more wrong.

The awards exist to spread the word about the host of folks out there putting in hours and hours of work to produce first-rate content. That's why we went with an exhaustive nomination process, that's why we're making the presentations a big deal, and that's why we're trying to draw attention to them, rather than do what we usually do (downplay ourselves).  

Further, none of us that are presenting these things are starved for traffic. This just isn't about that.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Jan 31, 2007 10:43 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Mehh
You may not like the idea of awards in general, but it seems that everyone likes to recognize the best within their own group, and this is no different.  

You are correct it is a ploy to spread out site hits, as part of what awards are given for is to try to recognize others who you think are worthy of more publicity than they currently are getting.

by Wells on Jan 31, 2007 10:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No
First, it's fine to be apathetic towards these awards. We're aware that other blogs are of little interest to many readers.

I will, though, defend the motivation of the awards and the presentation format, which has nothing to do with some kind of ploy to generate site traffic. That, I can assure you.

In any case, if the awards are of no interest to you - and that's fine and understandable - just skip the entries. I'd ask that you not denigrate them, though, or the founding premise behind them. It's not fair to the folks who we're seeking to recognize.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Jan 31, 2007 10:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I guess in my mind
"You are correct it is a ploy to spread out site hits, as part of what awards are given for is to try to recognize others who you think are worthy of more publicity than they currently are getting."

=

"The awards exist to spread the word about the host of folks out there putting in hours and hours of work to produce first-rate content. That's why we went with an exhaustive nomination process, that's why we're making the presentations a big deal, and that's why we're trying to draw attention to them, rather than do what we usually do (downplay ourselves)."

I was not trying to denigrate your awards.  I see awards as having two purposes.  One is to give recognition to the best work as felt by your peers.  If this was your only motive, then you would not need to post the awards, you could just email out ballots and then email out the awards.
The other purpose is to highlight what you and your peers feel as the best of the college sports world so people who would normally not go look at those blogs take a look.  This second objective should not denigrate the awards, it is not a bad objective to try and get more people to go to sites that you feel are the best of the blogs.

by Wells on Jan 31, 2007 11:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think I misunderstood you
I was arguing against the notion that the presentations themselves are a ploy to get the presenting blogs more traffic. That is most certainly not true.

We are, as you note, trying to get people to visit the winners.

Especially the ones who aren't well known. In the case of this award, the two winners are well known commodities. Nonetheless, for all that great work they do, they deserve this one day of official recognition.

Further, we're spreading the word of these out to a number of mainstream media folks who like blogs. It's a nice way to get a little publicity for the guys like MGoBlog and SMQ who are doing work that is equal to (at the least) the best of what you can get on SI or ESPN.com.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Jan 31, 2007 11:12 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ummm
Are you two done yet?

by WacArnolds on Jan 31, 2007 1:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.
Start posting about the Longhorns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Worsley_small
The best player for Kansas tonight was Jordan Hamilton
2828_75589049482_500259482_1575116_316800_s_small
2010 Big 12 Baseball Preview -- Return to the Promised Land
Small
Shall we start a firerickbarnes.com website
Small
tight end position
Small
Spring Football notes
Small
2009 NCAA Team, 2010 NIT Team
Small
Parking for Kansas game tonight?
2401104_1__small
Way too early 2010 Football Season predictions
Small
Beyond the 2010 season
Small
Can Barnes coach offense?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Menbooger_small GhostofBigRoy

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Official Partner of CBS Sports