Texas Basketball Report 2.6
This week's Texas Basketball Report (back to Fridays now and throughout the rest of the season) focuses on the rest of the Big 12 as Texas preps for conference play. First up, a visual guide to each team's season so far, categorized as follows:
PB: My power rankings of the teams heading into conference play.
KenPom: Ken Pomeroy's ratings
Sagarin: Jeff Sagarin's ratings
RPI: Ratings Percentage Index ratings
SOS: Strength of schedule, as measured by KenPom
+Wins: Wins of quality that will affect a team's chances of making the NCAA tournament and/or their seeding therein.
BREAKDOWN
North Division Favorite - Kansas. For the umpteenth year in a row, Kansas is the favorite in the North. In many recent years, this has also made them the heavy conference favorite, as several teams at the bottom of the North were gimme wins. Nebraska's still a bit of an unkwown right now, but if they can be competitive with Kansas in Lincoln, it's possible Kansas could have a tougher row to hoe than in recent years.
South Division Favorite - Texas. The Longhorns' chance of finishing 1 or 2 in the Big 12 this season probably begin and end with their road trips to Missouri (this Saturday) and Kansas State (February 25th). If they win those and take care of business against the lesser teams, they'll be in a position where splits with A&M and OU should be enough. A&M sits in the same boat as Texas, getting KSU and MU on the road, with the Jayhawks at home. If either team sweeps the conference series against the other, they'll be in terrific shape.
Best Offense - Texas. When the 'Horns are healthy, there aren't many teams who can run and score with as much efficiency as Texas. Bear in mind, too, that Texas has done most of its damage without any inside presence at all. Kansas and A&M are both solid, high 2-point percentage teams.
Best Defense - Kansas. Nothing new here, though Texas A&M is once again elite on defense. Kansas State, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Missouri all exceled at frustrating opponents in non-conference play, making the Big 12 once again one of the premier defensive leagues in the country. Texas fans get ready for the brutal banging of conference play. It's the same every year.
OUTLOOK FOR TEXAS
This Texas team is in almost exactly the same position as last season heading into conference play: extremely dangerous on offense, decent defensively, and vulnerable to physical teams who can muscle our guards and/or shoot the three ball.
The Kansas State loss last year presents a template of the kind of loss we should worry about this year. We remain a team that relies on two sub-six foot guards to play 35+ minutes, a weakness that leaves us vulnerable to teams who can hit the three pointer. On the flipside, those two guards can struggle offensively against teams who succeed in smothering the perimeter.
Which is why Gary Johnson is so critical to Texas' chances of winning the Big 12 this season. Though the Longhorns are a much more diverse offensive team than a season ago, of late we've struggled to score as teams have locked down the perimeter with impunity; Texas simply hasn't had an inside presence for which teams must account. Though Gary Johnson doesn't need to be a scoring machine in the post, if we can run our offense through him on some sort of regular basis, teams will be forced to stay honest on the interior. Likewise, with Johnson's arrival, Texas isn't forced to play Jay Mason 30-35 minutes a game, an offensive problem which allowed teams to double team without worry.
As mentioned above, Texas' road games at Missouri and Kansas State are the ones to watch. If the 'Horns picked up wins in each, they'd be in terrific shape overall. A loss in either of those contests would put additional pressure on Texas to beat Kansas in Austin. Remember: the goal this year - more than most - is to shoot for a high enough seed to enjoy some regional advantages in the bracket. A 1 or 2 seed could land Texas a trip to Houston for the South Regional. Like UCLA last season, that could be a huge boost in getting to the Final Four.
Texas Basketball Report Archives
TBR 2.1
TBR 2.2
TBR 2.3
TBR 2.4
TBR 2.5
TBR 2.6
--PB--
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
Missouri game could be a blowout
They have a couple of decent inside presences for us to worry about, but nothing we can't stop. In fact, now that we have a beast in Johnson, it is opposing teams that have to worry about our inside presence.
In Mizzou's case, the tallest player they have that plays at least 10 minutes a game is 6'9" Leo Lyons, and he's only averaging about 5 rebounds/game, and has only had double digit rebound games 2 times out of 15 games. Their best rebounder is 6'8" DeMarre Carroll at 6.8 rebs/game. Johnson/James both could have big time rebounding games at the least. Lyons and Carroll are both double digit scorers and both have a solid FG%.
Also, Missouri is only shooting 33% behind the arc. Only two players that play at least 10 minutes/game shoot over 40% (Brown and Hannah).
They average a lot of steals per game, but also a lot of fouls. Basically, if we rebound well, make most of our threes and FTs, and take care of the ball, I could see us pulling this game out easily.
Try to figure this one out: Damion James is shooting 55.0% from three and 55.7% from the free throw line.
by goingforthecorner on Jan 11, 2008 4:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
are there really...
34 teams that have had a tougher schedule than us to start the season?
Awesome post though...it's going to be a great year of Big 12 b-ball.
by hornshoops on Jan 11, 2008 5:35 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
maybe not that many
that played as many good teams, but you have to remember that we also played a lot of crappy teams as well.
by billyzane on Jan 11, 2008 7:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
SOS
Hmmm... from this kenpom link, it says we're 16th in strength of schedule.
by goingforthecorner on Jan 11, 2008 7:33 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That's SOS by the RPI
I used Ken Pomeroy's SOS ratings. There are a bunch of different measures (Sagarin has his own, as well).
In any case, they're all just good general guides. Basically: Texas' strength of schedule this year is outstanding.
by Peter Bean on Jan 11, 2008 8:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Surprising line
at least for me.
Vegas has the line set at Texas -1.
I know Mizzou is a big conference school and it's at their home, but is Texas really just one point better than Missouri @Mizzou?
by goingforthecorner on Jan 12, 2008 3:44 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
You're underestimating them
They play outstanding defense, are athletic, and can easily give Texas a hard time in Columbia. A blowout would surprise me.
by Peter Bean on Jan 12, 2008 11:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice report
Conference is here. The G-unit has a couple games under his belt. Wangmene should get relief minutes and Mason as well, but it will be interesting to see how Barnes uses the rest of the team.
Is Mooney going to continue to see minutes? Is Dex relegated to 5 minutes a game? Has Chap seen all his PT for the season?
NO preview for the game, PB/Awiggo?
Go Horns!
by jimmer on Jan 12, 2008 11:58 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
conference
who do you see winning the conference. It's probably true that TAMU and Texas will split like last year and that it'll come down to other games. I know TAMU plays Kansas at home the last game of the season. Chances are, it will be meaningless by then, but it would be badd-a if that determined the title. Obviously you think UT will triumph TAMU, but what do you think are UTs chances of beating Kansas?
by carsondude on Jan 12, 2008 12:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs























