Burnt Orange Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: SEC Preview, Week #2, Part 1 Bar-right-arrows



Texas Basketball Report 2.7

Think back with me to the end of November and our early season discussion about who would replace Kevin Durant's scoring. That's looking like a mostly solid evaluation, with two notable exceptions: Justin Mason and Damion James. Mason's struggles on offense are well-documented, and we took a look at Damion James' sophomore leap in mid-December.

Fast forward to today, and the Austin Chronicle's Thomas Hackett is asking the same question we were in December: How is Texas thriving despite losing a player as exceptional as Kevin Durant?

To answer that, Hackett turned to Dr. David Berri, an economist and the author of The Wages of Wins, which seeks to explain a basketball player's value with statistics more comprehensive than traditional counting stats. Writes Hackett:

I had called Berri to understand why the Longhorns are playing exactly as well this year (they're 15-3) as they did last year, when they had the best college player in the country in Kevin Durant. I thought D.J. Augustin had to be the reason: To my eyes, the kid is clutch, averaging 20 points and six assists a game. But nope, that's not it. According to a metric that Berri and his co-authors call a "win score," the biggest reason the Longhorns have been able to pick up where Durant left off is James.

Last season Augustin had a win score of .149. So far this year, it's .182 – an improvement but nothing compared to James' .393, which is within spitting distance of Durant's score of .403.

"It's important to understand that when Kevin Durant is not there, somebody else is going to take those shots," Berri explained. "The question is: Are they doing that and the other things that create wins efficiently?"

The table showing all the Longhorns' Win Scores from 2007-08 is here, and it's clear just how valuable James has been to this team. This comports with our eyeball test, too. When James has been sidelined by foul trouble, the team has struggled mightily; when he's out on the floor we look like an entirely different team.

I'd caution readers not to rely too heavily on Berri's formula, however, which looks problematic on a number of different levels. Wages of wins was created for the NBA, which is an entirely different game. Berri does not control for pace (critical in the college game), relies heavily on counting statistics, and does not account for the significantly higher value of the three point shot in college basketball. Which is why Hackett should have complimented Berri's analysis with what we can learn about Texas from Ken Pomeroy.

Pomeroy's stats also illuminate James' value to the 'Horns, but they present a more comprehensive data set to evaluate the contributions. Effective Field Goal Percentage (which appropriately weights the value of three point shots) shows that Connor Atchley is the most efficient offensive weapon on the Longhorn basketball team. James, in fact, is only fourth, behind both Augustin and Abrams. This reflects one of the fundamental differences between college and pro basketball - the importance of the three pointer. With the three point line nearly four feet closer to the rim, this isn't surprising.

I go through all of this to make a few points about the team:

1. Damion James' contributions to this team shouldn't be underestimated. By almost any analysis, James' value to the 2007-08 Longhorns is obvious. Even though Berri's numbers probably exaggerate his efficiency, Win Scores is really a composite rating; that is, it's meant to reflect the player's total contribution to the team. Fouls, rebounds, blocks, steals, points - it's all in there. Even though better controlled data would produce a more realistic assessment of James's contributions, as a rough measure, it makes the right point: there's no question that we need Damion on the floor to be the team we saw in December.

2. James' value can't be appreciated out of context. Take another peek at KP's Texas stat page. The number that jumps out to me is 15.3. As in, Texas gets 15.3 percent of its minutes from bench players - the 341st fewest in the country. So it's not just that Damion James is terrific when he's out on the floor, it's that Texas is still extremely weak behind the starting five.

3. The three point shot is Texas' double-edged sword. The biggest problem in Berri's analysis is that it ignores the relative value of the three point shot. Not only is it more prevalent in the college game, but, more fundamentally, three points is 50% more valuable than two. With that in mind, lessons abound:

  • AJ Abrams' three point slump has had a huge (negative) impact on our offensive efficiency.
  • Connor Atchley's value (22-38 from beyond the arc) this season has been tremendous.
  • Our small guards kill us defensively, as we rank 221st nationally in 3-point FG%.

At this point, it's just wishcasting to hope for better perimeter defense, but we can hope for Abrams to find his stroke again. Equally important, we must keep Connor Atchley involved - in games he's disappeared, Texas has struggled mightily. And finally, we can't afford to have Damion James sitting on the bench with foul trouble.

Texas Basketball Report Archives
TBR 2.1
TBR 2.2
TBR 2.3
TBR 2.4
TBR 2.5
TBR 2.6
TBR 2.7

--PB--

0 recs | Comment 5 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Pomeroy

Has Connor as #1 in the nation for offensive rating.

Get him the ball more.  I swear if we could get that fourth guy scoring, our team would move back into the elite, like we were earlier in the year.

Since then it seems like we refuse to pass the ball inside.

Let Connor hook it!

by BoddickerIsClutch on Jan 25, 2008 11:19 AM CST   0 recs

Re: Connor

I think he shoots 3s so well because he only takes them when he's wide open.  He might roll off a pick he sets for DJ then flashes back to the 3-pt line and is wide open.  And since he's a great shooter he can knock them down.  I never really see him take contested 3s.  This isn't a knock on him at all; rather, it's praise.  You have a higher chance of nailing a 3 if no one is in your face, and he does it well.  He is very good at shot selection, which I think has been a big reason why he's so efficient.  More often than most guys, he know when to shoot and when to pass.

I love the sky hook, too.

atsmahboy Kelson

by BigTexBD on Jan 25, 2008 2:40 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Nice TBR

This brings up an issue I had with our end of game strategy against OSU. As I remember, only once in the last ~7 minutes did we get the ball to Damion or Atch, and when we did it wasn't in a great position. Instead we ran AJ and Mason around, and basically left the offense up to DJ.

B/c Damion and Atch have shown they are extremely effective on the offensive end, crunch time seems like a perfect opportunity to give them the ball. Both those guys have great inside-outside threat and it would relieve some pressure off of DJ at the end of the game.

I would like to see many more hooks and jumpers from these two, so our guards can get more open for their 3 point looks. It appears AJ might only be able to shoot sans defender right now.

I love what AJ has done with his game this year, but some of his shot attempts need to go to Damion and Atch just based on their ability to score, and how effeciently they have been scoring.

Gary Johnson needs to learn to play D and score inside. We need a blowout so he can get some PT.

by jimmer on Jan 25, 2008 3:40 PM CST   0 recs

Baylor just dropped one to OU...

for their first conf. loss...but I didn't read much into it. You're just not going to bounce back after a 5OT thriller.

To their credit, OU had them down by like 16 with ten to play and they got it back to within 3 with a minute to play and had their chances to tie.

Be nobody but yourself in a world that desperately wants you to be like everybody else.

by 54b on Jan 26, 2008 5:51 PM CST   0 recs

Slightly off topic mini-rant
After reading this fine analysis, I've just gotta say that every time I hear a TV "analyst" talking out of our outdated press guide, I have to scream. I am so sick of hearing AJ Abrams described as "one of the top 3 point shooters in the country". I don't need to hear about TJ and DJ -- or DJ and Steve Nash -- eight more times in the next month. And, sweet Jesus, please don't make me listen to any more musings on whether the team is better without Durant.

Why can't these guys just read a couple of blogs like BON and get up to date on the teams they cover?  Are they that lazy?

by Caradoc on Jan 27, 2008 12:38 AM CST   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bruce-campbell_small
The Adventures of Bombilla, Jr.
Small
I am staring 0-12 in the face
Small
Lessons from Jeremy Maclin
Small
So I found out two weeks ago
Small
Afternoon Brewsky is Going Ugly Early

Recent FanPosts

Elish2_small
Starting Week 2 Deep in the Throes of Optimism
Small
Garrett Gilbert - National TV Tonight
Charles_jamaal_092306_300_small
Texas Gameday Photography (SFW)
Major_small
Kenton Paulino joins Rick Barnes' Coaching Staff
Small
Special teams
Small
In Colt We Trust
Biggamebob_small
Perfection of Colt McCoy Drives Horns
James_small
Comments on Kindle
M_598158e49cdb59e28223bb8c9d9f2c20_small
understanding the nation

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Editors

Pb6_small PB @ BON

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Editors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Bfvy_small Horn Brain

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Small GhostofBigRoy

ad

Site Meter