Texas Loses Heartbreaker To Wisconsin
Before we resume the Holiday Bowl/football team fun, there's a basketball game that needs dealing with.
Game Recap: Texas meandered through an entire game without ever really breaking out, and eventually it caught up to them, as Wisconsin stole a win at the Erwin Center 67-66.
The 'Horns led by three points with less than a minute to play, but Wisconsin scored a nice post basket on a mismatch with AJ Abrams to cut the lead to one. The Badgers then fouled Abrams with 10 seconds to play, but AJ only made one of his two free throws, extending the lead back to two. Wisconsin then took the ball down the court, hit a three, stole the inbounds pass and chucked it high into the air as Longhorn fans watched the clock in horror: 3... 2.. 1... effing ball game.
The outcome was: Maddening. If the football team was a sexy girl who generally frustrated us right from the get-go, the basketball team has been the opposite: though we went on that first date with lowered expecations, she was nothing short of stunning through the first handful of dates. And then as we're just starting to really fall for her she mentions that she's married. WTF, woman?
Setting aside the metaphors, I was fine with the loss to Michigan State, but I had to flip the channel a dozen times today as ESPN showed the "highlights" from Texas' clash with Wisconsin. I'm not being a what-have-you-done-for-me-lately jackass here, either. I was going to be perfectly content with an ugly, not-our-best-performance win. But when we actually gave up that win in the final minute, the frustration erupted.
Here's the thing: in the grand scheme of things, everything is fine. We're off to a very strong start, have shown some promise, and have plenty of room to grow. But this team managed to pick up a neutral court win over Tennessee and a true road win over UCLA. With those wins under our belts, the stakes were raised. And though we didn't give much back with an easily forgivable loss to Michigan State in Detroit, we gave some of our winnings away with today's loss.
Think of it this way: Imagine entering the World Series of Poker and finishing the first day as one of the top four chip leaders, then starting day two by giving away a third of your stack because you chased a flush on a hunch. That's what today's loss felt like. Just stupid. None of this is to discredit Wisconsin, who admirably hung tight throughout. But Texas had every opportunity - and ability - to win this game. Damnit.
The Offensive MVP was: Damion James. I go back and forth on who's improved more - Connor or Damion. The difference with Connor is more visibly obvious, but Damion's taken an enormous step forward with his offensive game. What I really like is his ability to score on jump shots off the dribble; if you'd asked me before the season whether I thought James' could be a guy who can create his own looks like he has been, I'd have laughed you off.
It's especially fun because he still looks pretty damn raw out there at times, so there's room to improve, but of all Texas' players this season, James has been the most impressive at creating his own good scoring chance. That's an odd thing to say for a team that features DJ Augustin, but our sophomore point guard has hit a bit of a wall as teams have adjusted their game plans to take away his dribble penetration. He's doing well overall, but he's got some adjusting of his own to do as a scorer.
All this is just to point out that James has evolved from being a freak of an athlete to being a freak of an athlete who can shoot the ball from 12-15 feet. With his high release, nice size, athletic prowess, and improved ball handling, it's tough to deny him a clean shot. Augustin is the more skilled player, but he's got bigger physical hurdles to overcome.
The Defensive MVP was: N/A Texas' overall team defense was mostly fine, but Wisconsin was a really uninspiring offensive ballclub. We're not disruptive enough as a team as small as we are needs to be, and the mismatches Wisconsin took advantage of in the second half eventually wound up costing us the game.
The Freshman Evaluation tonight was: Hallelujah. I think the Gary Johnson news deserves a siren. What do you think? (God we need this kid to be what we hope he can be...)
Dexter Pittman Watch: 13 minutes, 4 points (2-4), 4 rebounds, 1 block, 1 foul, 2 TOs. Oh, Dexy. I thought Rick was wise to give Pittman 10-12 minutes in this game, and he gave us some good and some bad. On defense, Pittman takes about 13 seconds to load his body before he can jump up off the floor. By that time, of course, the opponent has scored, Texas has inbounded the ball and is running the court on offense.
Still, Pittman provides a good body to have in games like this. The only problem right now is that he's still a year away from really harnessing it in a consistently positive way. Pittman's a great kid, with great hands, good energy, and big potential. But he's still got so far to go before he's a guy who can give Texas 20-25 minutes of difference-making basketball.
(A relevant parenthetical here, as this report is pretty damn negative: it's useful to remember how much room this team has to grow. The exciting start to the season has raised expecations, but I know Andrew and I each felt like this wasn't a team that could be a force until February, at the earliest. Even as we lay down - sometimes harshly - the weaknesses, it's uplifting to note how much room Texas has to grow.)
Three Things: (1) Counter-adjustments needed on offense... starting yesterday. It's time to adjust, Rick. We came out the gates strong, surprised some people, and are enjoying a terrific start to the season. But the book is out on how to defend Texas, and it's time to make some counter-adjustments. DJ Augustin is finding it harder and harder to get to the rim, and though we've done a reasonably good job scoring anyway, the offensive plan is built around DJ getting dribble penetration. And teams are taking that away.
(2) All hail Gary Johnson. AW will have more on Johnson in his TCU preview (Wednesday, 4:00 p.m., Erwin Center), but let's take a moment to celebrate now. Texas has done a better than expected job rebounding this season, but as mentioned above, the offense needs to be tweaked as teams continue to smother our perimeter. Right now, Texas isn't scoring in the post much; Johnson might be able to help keep the defense more honest, allowing our guards more room to do what they do best.
(3) Jay Mason is totally lost. I think a lot of Jay's problems right now are mental, and a trip to the bench might do him some good. The defense is still good, but he's not enough of a rebounder to keep giving him 35 minutes a game when Johnson returns. And coming off the bench might help him get on track offensively. Right now he's just unsure what he wants to do: he's thinking before he shoots, and not finishing very well when he drives. I'm not worried about him in the Long Term, but he's in a bad place right now. Rick's always been good at handling things like this; I'm sure they'll get it worked out.
Even with everything discussed above, Texas should have won on Saturday. Though Rick needs to do some tweaking with the offensive game planning, this loss was mostly on the kids. Usually, Andrew and I reserve the largest portion of the blame for the coach(es), but not this time. The 'Horns just didn't execute very well. Missed free throws and missed layups just killed us for the second game in a row. Time to regroup against TCU and try to get one more solid non-con win over St. Mary's.
NEXT GAME: Home vs. TCU (Erwin Center) – Wednesday 1/02 4:00 p.m.
--PB--
0 recs |
10 comments
Comments
Mason
We know he can shoot, because he shot so well last year (until the end of the season). Coming in to the season, he was being hailed the most improved player on the team. I think we'll see him break out at some point.
I think taking him out of the starting lineup might be the wrong idea, mainly because we rely on him for so many things and also because we don't have anyone to replace him. Maybe once Gary Johnson gets comfortable we can start James at 3 and bring in Mason off the bench.
PB, who do you suggest we start instead of him (right now)?
by longhorn00 on Dec 30, 2007 2:27 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Will write more on this in the next TBR
But I think, pending watching Johnson play a bit, that we ought to transition to DJ, AJ, Damion at the 3, with Connor and Johnson in the post. Let Mason be a perfect sixth man off the bench. If we want to run and get quick, he can sub for Johnson. If we want to get bigger and lock down on D, he can come in for AJ.
I agree that he brings a lot to the team, but not 35 minutes per game worth right now. His offensive game is THAT far off right now. I'd like to see him slip into a more utility role, 25-30 minutes a game, and let him work through the offensive problems.
by Peter Bean on Dec 30, 2007 2:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bench
I just got finished watching the Wisconsin game after spending all day yesterday traveling.
The news of Johnson getting cleared to play could not come at a better time. Mason is beyond lost. Barnes has already hinted that Gary is going to have to work himself into game shape, but he has been praticing with the team. I will be shocked if he gets anything less than 20 minutes against TCU and 25 against St Mary's.
Mason has zero confidence in his jumper, his back to blindly driving at the basket, and is --way-- to small to play on the back side of the 2-3 zone. We have all complained about having both AJ and DJ at the top when we go zone, but, to me, the real weakness is along the baseline on Mason's side.
Teams go zone to take away the inside scoring and force outside jumpers. When we go zone with Mason in there, we are inviting teams to attack the basket from the baseline on his side or simply rebound over him.
Mason is going to be a very good Texas Longhorn by the time he leaves Austin, but right now the best place for him is as a 6th man off the bench. He can play point for 6-8 minutes, shooting guard for 4-6 minutes, and still spell James at the three for 8 more minutes.
With Johnson's arrival, this team is going to look a lot different and be a lot better. I said a few weeks ago that this team couldn't be elite with Gary Johnson. Yeseterday's loss to Wisconsin helps prove my point.
by awiggo on Dec 30, 2007 3:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree that he's not a 35 minute player
but Barnes has been forced to play him a lot because of our lack of depth. He'll play less once Gary gets back, freeing James up for more time playing 3.
It'd be hard to find a 6'2" guard who plays the back end of a 2-3 as well as Mason, but the fact remains that he IS a 6'2" guard, and thus will not be very effective. He's just playing out of position due to our lack of depth.
by longhorn00 on Dec 30, 2007 4:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree Some on Pittman
In theory, Rick should play Dex for 10-15 minutes against a big physical team that slows the ball down and forces Texas to play in the half court. That theory cracked some in the Wisconsin game.
Even though Texas was missing some easy shots early, the Longhorns were playing their pace, getting good looks in transition, and forcing Wisconin to abandon the offensive glass to protect against the run out.
Then the pace slowed.
Barnes inserted Pittman and it slowed even more. The Horns got almost nothing in the second half in transition, were killed on the offensive glass, and couldn't defend the post at all.
Given his size, Pittman should have provided Texas a post presence on offense, should have been able to defend Butch in the post, and should have gotten his soft hands on some loose rebounds. None of that happened.
Pittman "jumped" every time a Wisconsin player raised his eyebrows and sending himself off balance and out of position. During the few times, he was able to stay on the floor, he was abused by Butch for easy layups. And in 13 minutes he managed to grab just a single offensive rebound.
Dex remains a lovable character who was able to dominate in high school b/c of his size. Even after dropping 70+ lbs, he is still a looooong way from being able to contribute. He doesn't have good body control, jumps too often on pump fakes, is out of position in the 2-3 too often, and seems to be off balance on every other possession.
I'd have rather seen Clint Chapman or Alexis Wangmene in the Wisconsin game. Chapman can strech the defense and rebounds better on a per minute basis than anyone else on the team. Wangmene is awful on offense but is at least a stable force in the paint on defense.
Dex needs to lose another 20 lbs and spend another year in the weight room before he is ready to contribute. Right now, he reminds me of Henry Melton leaping for the pylon at Ohio State: a player with skills but no idea how to use his body effectively.
by awiggo on Dec 30, 2007 3:33 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Devastating Melton comparison
You are probably right about Pittman (that is the way I felt after watching him up close in person at the Rice game).
Having said that, Pittman seemed to get and down the court much better in the Wisconsin game. He is also now able to stuff the ball in traffic. both of these are big upgrades in just two weeks. If Dexter can get in a lot better shape (a huge if), he can help the horns a bunch.
What works against Dexter is that the horns need for their big men to help out the horns' guards on D (when playing man to man D and the horns' guards get posted up). This requires speed and stamina. The probability that Dexter will have the requisite speed this season to help out on D is vanishingly small.
If the horns are playing zone or the horns' guards don't need help in man to man, then it is possible that Dexter may have something to contribute before the end of the season.
by Kafka on Dec 31, 2007 9:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Frustration station
You are right to place blame on the players for this loss. They missed layups and rebounded terribly. Had the Horns secured the rebound w/ 0:34 on the clock we would have had two chances to go up by 4. We didn't get that rebound and that was the story of the second half: Not getting the rebound.
Kudos to Horns fans in the Austin area for showing up. There were empty seats at the arena level from students on Holiday and a few season ticket holders, but the upperdeck was pretty crowded and overall it was LOUD.
Jay is certainly having problems with his shot, as it looks like he jumps and then tries to shoot out of rhythm. And Wisconsin went after his side of the zone quite a bit, probably designed. I also thought he was consistantly moving to high in the zone and they were throwing over the top of him.
Gary Freakin Johnson. Alright! If he can contribute as much as I think he can it will take a whole lot of pressure off the starters. Start Mason one more game, and then sit him from St. Mary's on, and put Gary Freakin Johnson in his place. It gives us so many options for substituting and helps our rebounding and defense substantially - at least down the road. I have said it before based on the Xavier (La.) game, but Pittman also said it in his postgame interview after the loss, Gary Freakin Johnson reminds us of PJ Tucker. I sure wouldn't mind having another PJ around. GJ sounds similar.
by jimmer on Dec 30, 2007 8:19 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Not too worried yet
I think the Gary Johnson impact is going to be huge. I do hope that Barnes plays him a bunch of minutes right away.
The horns should be able to solve their offensive problems pretty easily with the addition of Gary Johnson (or even without him). Wisconsin showed the value of a passing offense. Making Augustin do all the work by dribble penetration most of the time is just putting too much pressure on Augustin (not to mention that it wears him out). Augustin is a fine shooter so it would not be a bad thing for him to get a kick out pass every now and then so he can do his 3 point shooting thing.
I am much more worried about D. I realize that Barnes is an outstanding D coach but it is difficult to construct a D when two of the players are so small (i.e. Augustin and Abrams). Augustin looks like he understand low post D quite well and he is certainly a tough guy but it will be tough for him to guard a 6'4" guy in the low post.
Abrams has no hope in low post D, he is just too short and too light. If the horns play man, they are going to have to provide lots of help to Augustin and Abrams in the low post when the opposing coach is smart enough to invert his offense.
The horns got off to a fast start this season but that was to be expected because they had 4 returning starters and the 5th starter had some starting experience. In addition the horns were playing a lot of zone D and most teams are not really ready to attack a zone D early in the season.
Damion James was amazing. Atchley had 3 blocks and 2 steals, that ain't bad. He also hit 50% of his shots. He only got 7 rebounds but that is mediocre. With James and Johnson rebounding, Atchley's rebounding totals will probably go down as the season progresses but that will not hurt the horns.
I have always loved james as a player and would love to see more pick and roll with james as the picker. I would also love to see how he does in the low post and on some alley oops. I also think that he could be devastating by faking the jump shot at the free throw line (which he is shooting well) and take one power dribble (i.e. pass the ball to yourself off the bounce), plus a jump stop to set to the rim (might not need the jump stop).
The horns are going to have a hard time playing D super intensely until they play fewer minutes per man. It would be great if Wingman turns into a defensive and rebounding monster.
I was pretty impressed with Pittman. He got up and down the floor OK and he was able to jump the 3 inches necessary to stuff the ball with primordial power. If Barnes is OK with Pittman, so am I.
Wisconsin looked like a well coached team, they earned their victory.
I am extremely optimistic about the runnin horns (and I tend to be pretty critical). Johnson will be a huge boost, Mason is going to turn it around, Pittman improved quite a bit in the last couple of weeks in his ability to run the court and jump, and I hope that Barnes can coach up either wingman or Chapman to give the horns some more minutes off the bench. Since the horns don't really need offense from their big man subs, I have more hope in wingman than Chapman because of his athleticism.
The Wisconsin game was the last game of the ancien regime; the TCU game is 10 times more interesting because Gary Johnson will be playing.
by Kafka on Dec 30, 2007 9:17 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Layups
You can get better at free throws by practicing, so that is fixable. But how do you get better at making layups? This game was not a fluke. For years this team has failed to convert its share of easy baskets. It's so bad, that I gotta think they'd do better passing the ball back out for another play than trying to stick an offensive rebound back in.
by Caradoc on Dec 30, 2007 9:26 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
definitely not true
the layups will come.
by jimmer on Dec 30, 2007 10:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs


























