Morning Coffee Has Much To Sort Out
One of the most interesting - not to mention important - questions of the 2007 season will be the play of the linebacking corps, a subject Kirk Bohls featured with aplomb yesterday. The Statesman columnist does a nice job of framing the big picture for the upcoming season: Texas has six guys who can play - three upperclassmen (Derry, Bobino, Killebrew) with experience and three underclassmen (Kindle, Norton, Muckelroy) with tremendous athletic ability, but far less experience.
It's a legitimately complicated situation, too - however black and white some fans want to make it. Robert Killebrew is a perfect example of just how gray (charcoal) this is: On the one hand, the guy simply didn't make plays last year. As far as SLBs go, he was one of the conference's weakest starters in 2006, at least performance-wise. On the other hand, there's an awful lot of chatter (rightly so) about the need for some real leadership in post-VY Texas football, and Killebrew's a fiery senior who's grown into a vocal firecracker in the locker room and on the field.
That's just one example, but the whole situation is filled with juxtapositions. Derry is a far cry from an athletic player, but, as Duane Akina puts it, "He's the Michael Huff of his position mentally."
And on and on it goes. The speculation right now is interesting, but we won't resolve any of these conflicts until we have some tape from the field to review. Killebrew says he's busted his ass to improve his position play - will he? Will Derry improve his pass coverage abilities? Is Bobino going to avoid more blocks this year? And what of the young guys? Is Muck really ready to be a star? Can Kindle realize his potential?
Right now - more questions than answers.
Speaking of positional uncertainty, Duane Akina hasn't sorted out the secondary yet, either. As with the linebackers, there are more questions than answers, and as with above, we just can't say too much about it until we see some of these kids out there.
The biggest difference is the experience gap between the returning LBs and DBs. Texas may have failed to produce a bevy of top LB prospects over the last decade, but it has been Secondary U over that same period. Michael Huff, Quentin Jammer, Nathan Vasher, Michael Griffin, Aaron Ross - the list goes on and on.
And don't forget - at least statistically speaking - the unit can't perform any worse than the '06 group did. Some regression to the mean is to be expected, even with the dropoff in experience.
Let's switch over to the offensive side of the ball, starting with this excellent story from Chip Brown on what adjustments Greg Davis needs to make in '07.
Those of you who were at the BookPeople book signing last week got a taste of this, as both Chip and I talked a bit about how well-suited this Texas offense is to be a pass-first spread attack. The big question is whether Mack Brown will allow it. As Chip notes, Greg Davis isn't married to a power running game - Mack Brown is. My position on this is well known, but I think Davis is one of CFB's better offensive coordinators.
And as Chip Brown notes, this would be the perfect season for Mack to shed his insecurities about not being a powerful, hard-nosed running team. I weighed in on this last week when I noted that, at the least, Mack Brown is asking the right question. If he gets the answer right, this is going to be the most explosive non-VY offense Texas fans have seen in decades.
The interesting thing is, going to a Leach-like spread attack (similar to the one he ran at OU, and now at Tech) knocks out all of Texas' weakest birds with one stone. The offensive linemen get to pass protect. The receivers (huge team strength) are emphasized. Colt is the primary conductor. And we can run off the success of the pass.
It's ideal in so many ways and, I think, the key to the 2007 season. More than anything else.
Last, before I resume unpacking and moving in to the new home, a quick shout out to all my gracious hosts on the trip up here.
First, to Orson and his wife, who showed me the best of Atlanta in 36 hours, to my delight. Saturday night was particularly outstanding, featuring first a dinner with Orson, his wife, and my good friend Kyle, followed by one of the best nights out on the town that I can remember. Those in the Atlanta area need to make a point about making it out to Club MJQ. Best club night I've had in a long time. And it wasn't that a half dozen girls (no joke/bragging here) sexually assaulted me on the dance floor (though that was wonderful). It's just a badass club, with a counter-lit bar, good music, and an awesome crowd. I'm counting down the days until I can go back.
Second, to my incomparable Uncle Tom and Aunt Jan, who can still make me laugh like no one else. And Tom? If you ever cut up 17 peppers for dinner again, I'll kill you. (Seriously - thanks for everything. See y'all in Chicago.)
--PB--
0 recs |
15 comments
Comments
A Trip To MJQ
is not complete w/o a stop into The Clairmont Lounge
by thejahpaul on Aug 21, 2007 2:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
glad to have morning coffee back!
i very much agree with Chip Brown and PB's assessment of the offense - I would love to see us shed the vestiges of the power running game and spread it out and throw it all over the field (basketball on grass as ol' Carl Reese used to say).
but on a peripheral note, why does everyone think jamaal is so small and poorly suited to running between the tackles? from the chip brown article -
Texas has inexperience along the offensive line, but a pinpoint passer in Colt McCoy, a deep, talented receiving corps and running back Jamaal Charles, a sprinter who may not have the size (6-1, 205) to lug it between the tackles 30 times a game.
he's the same size as darren mcfadden, emmanuel moody, mike hart and mike goodson!
jamaal is not your average "sprinter" - he's a football player with track speed!
does this guy look like a classic "sprinter"?

by cortexas on Aug 21, 2007 7:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Heyo
by Kahuna on Aug 21, 2007 8:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Welcome to the club
Although, I bet PB might change his tune if you asked him how he rated GD as a game day OC.
by Wells on Aug 21, 2007 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uncle Tom
Yo, why he be frontin'? Playas gots to keep it real.
by smq on Aug 21, 2007 9:18 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Last year our linebacking sucked
I don't care how much leadership Killebrew shows or how he has busted his ass. If he still gets burned over and over and still commits those stupid penalties, none of that counts. All these guys needs to work on their reads instead of just firing out. It has always seemed to me that the Texas defense was more about trying to get guys into the backfield than in stopping the play.
I think it is inevitable that the new LBs will be taking over. Talent will out. The question is whether they should be taught to play as a unit or to be groomed as individual substitutes. I would favor the first option and go to a full platoon system, expecting to switchover around mid season.
by Caradoc on Aug 21, 2007 9:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll be interested
to see if GD expands the amount of plays he allows Colt to digest and how much control Colt will have at the line. We saw a few new plays in the Alamo Bowl, but he's had an entire off season to incorporate a few more.
Texas basically runs a scaled down version of the Indianapolis Colts offense. I see no reason why the running game can't be semi-effective without having to plow down hill.
BTW, has anyone been following the TCU defensive line problems? Blake leaves for several days and then returns. Now their starting DT is sitting out the season for reasons unknown.
If I was throwing out theories I would guess the NCAA drug testing visited the locker room, Blake caught wind and bolted for a few days (allowing the drugs to pass through) -- but the unlucky DT got caught. But that is just a wild theory.
by EYESofBEVO on Aug 21, 2007 10:35 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Peter sees it
For almost 20 years now, Greg Davis keeps his job as Mack Brown's OC by delivering exactly the offense Mack Brown wants on the field of play.
People who consistently complain about Greg Davis have never understood that fact.
As for Killebrew, any player that consistently repeats the same mistakes and retains his starting position is a symptom of poor coaching. Recognize it for what it is.
by HornChamps on Aug 21, 2007 10:47 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
oversimplification
To say that Kbrew keeping his job as a sign of poor coaching doesn't take all factors into consideration. The 'backers behind Kbrew may not have been as good as him. Injuries to others may have played a role in his continued job security. To paraphrase an out of work defense secretary, you play the games with the linbackers you have, not the linebackers you want.
by DogTown on Aug 22, 2007 8:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Find a post from him on Football
that does not directly or indirectly criticize the UT coaching staff.
by Wells on Aug 22, 2007 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Moody News
Moody, the Trojans' second-leading rusher last season, decided last week to transfer in search of a more featured role. He said Monday that he would first visit North Carolina, then Florida, Texas and Oklahoma State.
by jc25 on Aug 21, 2007 2:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
adjustments in the offense
Despite the tremendous speed of the Texas skill players I have to wonder if Texas has the OL to play the spread offense. Using Texas Tech as the example spread offense, their offensive line takes very wide gaps in their sets, which requires linemen with quick feet to adjust to attacking rushers coming through different gaps on each play. With the exception of Tony Hills, I'm doubting that the UT linemen have the "dance" to protect the passer in the spread when they were recruited for the power running game. I think that having no real threat of runs between the tackles allows the defense to get creative with zone blitzing. Does this account for all the indecision we're reading about?
by burnt in ny on Aug 21, 2007 6:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
we don't recruit OL for a power running game
we run a zone blocking scheme, widely regarded as a finesse scheme.
by cortexas on Aug 22, 2007 8:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
tutored
After reading up on this Bob Davie's Football 101 zone blocking, and Bob Davie's Football 101 spread offense, I stand corrected
by burnt in ny on Aug 23, 2007 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs



























