Burnt Orange Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Race to the Roses & BCS Bowl Predictions

Postgame Reaction

First, Texas wins. It wasn't exactly pretty, but honestly? After seeing what happened to Michigan today, the "A win is a win" pill is a lot easier to swallow. I'll take it.

Second, though Texas was decidedly mediocre this evening, the outcome was never in question. 21-13 over Arkansas State is a depressing score to look at in the morning paper, but I can't say that I was ever worried we'd lose.

Finally, I have to note how positively happy I was that a small Texas game watching party came together at my apartment in South Bend. Five BONers wound up coming over to watch the game with me, and though none of us were terribly impressed with the performance, it was great to be amongst friends.

With that said? It's tempting to start ranting about the letdowns in this game. But as I was sitting down to do so, I reminded myself of this post from Thursday night. In particular, I made myself re-read these points:

I was starting to write about how much this Texas team needs to establish a real identity this year, but I remembered last season's 56-7 destruction of North Texas and how little (read: none) bearing that had the following week when a real team came to Austin.

[...]

Don't read too much into the game. This might be my biggest concern, to be honest. All the injuries Texas has suffered to receivers this summer and fall have led Texas to list a fullback as a starter. A fullback. As in, I-formation. As in, we're a running team first.

I'm not going to make the mistake that I'm highlighting here and read too much into it (this is Arkansas State), but I hope the opposite is true, too: When we run over, around, and through Arkansas State on Saturday, our coaches need to be careful not to interpret that as a sign that we're a RunFirst team. Rushing the football is important, and something we must improve from a year ago, but this is Colt's team and an offense which can be extraordinarily explosive if we play to our strengths.

Mack, if you're out there - I beg of you: spread it out this season, pass the ball, let teams try to figure out how to stop our running game when they're scared shitless of what Colt McCoy and his army of receivers might do to them.

Two points here.

  1. Just as we shouldn't have read too much into a hypothetical blowout, we shouldn't get too carried away with the actual final score, which was closer than it should have been. I'll spend my fair share of words on the shortcomings of the Texas performance during the positional breakdowns, but for now, overall, I'm content with accepting the fact that we were just a little bit off tonight.
  1. The coaches didn't show any aversion to running a pass-first, spread-based offensive attack. Colt McCoy was off tonight, but from the get-go, it was clear that the aerial assault was the primary focus. We'll get into the details of all this tomorrow, but for now, I'm at least happy that there wasn't an identity crisis.

Now. With all that said, the game was a disappointment overall. All of this will be discussed in greater detail in the positional and scheme breakdowns, but here's the quick and dirty list of head shakers:

*The running game, while not bad, was all too reminiscent of 2006.
*The linebackers continue to be a source of more disappointment than excitement.
*Tweedle Dee was... well, he wasn't good.
*The secondary as a whole was inconsistent.
*The personnel decisions are going to be a point of contention. And soon.

Those are the big points of weakness which stood out to me tonight. I'll go ahead and note right now that A) I saw enough talent on the field today to believe this team can win the Big 12, and B) the coaches have a lot of work left to do to get us to the point where that can happen.

For tonight? Let's enjoy the return of football, be glad we're not Michigan fans, and try to reflect on what we saw tonight. The temptation here is to point to the sky and note its apparently rapid descent. But I saw tonight as much good as I did bad. I thought Texas had two categories of problems tonight - those that were structural, and those that were more a case of being a bit off.

I'm not worried about winning 21-13 over Arkansas State. I am worried about the structural problems. It's just important that we distinguish the two, and focus our attention on the latter.

That's what we'll do tomorrow.

Hook 'Em

--PB--

0 recs  |  Comment 23 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Reward for staying up late

Looks like I get the first comment, and I will try not to overreact. Having followed only the play-by-play, I have only a stark picture and some depressing stats to go by. The first observation is that overall, ASU had better game stats than UT in virtually every category. In that respect, we were lucky to win. My second impression was that this is a team that was unready to take the field, not an 'off night' by an otherwise established squad. The offense had some good moments and the special teams were good, but the defense was inept in virtually every respect.

The best hope is that Brown decided to treat this like a preseason game and did not show his best stuff. However, the team tonight is in trouble against TCU.

by Caradoc on Sep 2, 2007 12:58 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Not much positive to take from tonight

There's just not.

The only thing I'm trying to do is to avoid the opposite mistake, which would be jumping off a cliff over this game.

We'll know exactly how good this team is next week. If we play like we did tonight, TCU will win. No question about it.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Sep 2, 2007 1:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hmm..

Based on the defensive statistics the top tacklers are the whole secondary with ryan palmer being the top tackler. Damn thats not good.

by texaslonghorns07 on Sep 2, 2007 1:16 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Hey guys....Fusker here....

Wow, love the fancy dynamic text-box web2.0 'Post Comment' gizmo.  Very classy.

Mack must have procured a copy of Sun Tzu's The Art of War.  Appear weak when you are strong....  

Everything will be fine.

Nuttier than a four-balled Tomcat.

by fusker on Sep 2, 2007 1:34 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

looks bad

like some other posters on this thread, i am commenting solely based on the box score, but I second everyone's concern - an 8 point win is ugly.

I have to say this blog may have gotten too friendly with the Mack Brown administration.  I am not giving up, or forgeting the 2005/2006, but last year was back to what I have come to expect from a Texas program - good team, lots of talent but will find a way to blow games with coaching mishaps.  It looks like this year could be more of the same.

I still can't get over the fact that we lost the Big 12 south after beating OU last year.  We lost it by losing to a bad A&M team at home.

Anyways - I will find a way to catch the TCU game.  I hope I am proven wrong.

Crystal Balls

by MMHorns on Sep 2, 2007 2:10 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

PB is right

I was there, and there was never a point when I thought there was a chance we would lose.  If anything this game was frustrating.  I don't know where our run defense went, and I don't know what made Mack choose Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum to start in the secondary.  Colt stared down the receiver on every play, and did not once try to fool the secondary.  He also missed some wide open receivers because he was locked on to one guy.  He was forcing passes, and making bad decisions.  That being said, there were two things in this game that had me feeling good.  One was that Limas Sweed looks completely healthy, and looked as good as he ever.  Another was the play of Eddie Jones.  Even though the reason that he got all the PT was bad, he played well, and showed signs of why he was so highly rated coming out of HS.  So, I don't think we should take too much out of this game, but if we play like this against any other opponent on our schedule, including Baylor, we will lose.  Let's just hope we got this out of our system, and chose to play our worst game against our worst opponent...

by mmorales11 on Sep 2, 2007 2:29 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

So frustrating

Our O-line, quarterback, cornerbacks were awful.  On many occasions we had open receivers which Colt could not connect.  Our secondary left their receivers open too.  Colt should have had 5 picks.  They drove to our red zone four (or three?) times without scoring ....

It was sad. I'm drunk. But still, in Mack I believe.

Go Horns, Go Vince, Go Mavs

by Cyrus on Sep 2, 2007 2:37 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

They coulda won...

... but they didn't.

But of course ESPN = Chicken Little, so they will focus on the fact that Texas "almost" joined Michigan.  Several key points they call out:

Arkansas State, outgained Texas 397 yards to 340 and drove inside the 20 four times without scoring.

McCoy finished with 223 yards passing and two touchdowns, but also threw two interceptions and had three more passes dropped by Indians defenders.

And the short-yardage running game that all but disappeared last season? Still missing. Texas couldn't punch the ball into the end zone on four running plays from the Arkansas State 3 in third quarter.

With three new starters in the secondary and co-coordinator Duane Akina calling the plays this season, the defense often looked lost as Arkansas State mixed the run and pass.

Texas didn't have this one wrapped up until Brandon Foster recovered an onside kick with less than a minute to play, and that came after the Indians (0-1) were forced to re-kick because of a penalty that negated an onsider they recovered.

ESPN

There are other questions that come to mind:

What happened to that McCoy to Cosby connection?
Where was Jermichael Finley all night?
Who was covering Dejohnette on the 50-yard pass? Tweedle Dee or Tweedle Dum?

On a positive note, the kicking game appeared to be decent at least statistically, but it's still weird seeing Colt punt, even though I know he did it in HS. Limas and Jamaal both had decent nights. And I guess four sacks is a decent number. But come on... how many of us were expecting a "decent" night against this team??

Officially a Limey Longhorn

by patienthornsfan on Sep 2, 2007 5:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Foster

PHF, I was one of the few who appear to have been in attendance last night. Foster was definitely the one who was burned deep. The ball was beautifully thrown and without his closing speed, it would have easily gone for six.

PB and I have talked about some odd personnel decisions, especially on defense, and I'll let him get into it in more detail, but a few of my quick thoughts. Kelson wasn't on the field much; he didn't make any memorable plays but wasn't burned either. I can't see how we keep him on the sidelines. Foster was terrible, although the scheme for most of the night had both corners playing eight to ten yards off the ASU wideouts. Palmer was decent for the first three quarters but was repeatedly picked on in the 4th as ASU drove 90+ yards for their final score. Beasley also grabbed some playing time and like Kelson was neither a negative nor a positive.

I'd like to see Palmer and Beasley at starting corner with Kelson and Griffin (for now) at the safey spots. I didn't even get into the poor LB play but Kindle, Norton, and Muck should be the starters.

--AW--

by awiggo on Sep 2, 2007 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Other scary stats of the night
  1. Marlon Lucky - 30 carries for 232 yards and three TDs
  1. TCU forced Baylor to turn the ball over four times and held the Bears to just 52 yards rushing
  1. DeMarco Murry had 5 rushing TD's
  1. Sam Bradford - 21/23 363 and 3 TD's (that's the stat line I was expecting for McCoy!)
  1. Stephen McGee led the Aggies in rushing, carrying the ball eight times for 124 yards and two TDs
  1. Perrish Cox had 6 returns for 122 yards, including a long of 50 - the only bright spot of the night for the hapless Cowboys
Officially a Limey Longhorn

by patienthornsfan on Sep 2, 2007 5:51 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Rankings

WVU will definetly jump Texas in the Coaches poll after yesterday's results. The question is, will either Wisconsin or Oklahoma? And will any of Florida, Wisconsin or OU jump Texas in the AP poll?

I definetly was impressed by how easily Georgia handled OSU's high-powered offense. Let's see if they carry that momentum into SEC play. With Stafford settling in to the starting role, and Tebow having a solid coming out party, the Cocktail Party should be a barn-burner this year.

I'll say Michigan drops 10 spots to 15, and Tennessee drops about 5 spots. Otherwise not much movement given that very few games of significance were played this weekend.

Officially a Limey Longhorn

by patienthornsfan on Sep 2, 2007 6:15 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Totally agree
"the Cocktail Party should be a barn-burner this year." That is a game I always look forward to each year.
"Nobody leaves this field until we beat the hell out of them".................... L.J."Louis"Jordan in 1913 before kickoff of the Texas/ou game.

by ouALWAYSsux on Sep 2, 2007 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Compared to OU

I understand, we shouldn't put much into this game.  Still, it's hard to watch other comparable teams -- or teams we believe are comparable -- tear apart inferior opponents.

With the Texas game on the radio, I watched OU demolish North Texas.  Good lord OU looked good.  I hate them, and their fans are lunatics, but I can't deny my respect for them.  DeMarco Murray seemed faster than advertised, and the defense was relentless.  

Looks like I'll have to temper my expectations again.  Texas sucked last night, and there's no way around that.  How many improvements can they possibly make in one week?

Offensive struggles, porous defense...
I guess John Chiles will just have to wait to get his snaps.

by Kool Hand on Sep 2, 2007 7:49 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Pre-season worries now in-season worries

First off, like some of the previous posters...I am stuck outside the viewing area and couldn't watch this game.  Please feel free to point out any misperceptions.

Before the season started I had really four concerns (in order):

1)The Secondary- I was very concerned that the recent string of highly talented DBs, most of whom were at least thought of by NFL scouts, was going to dry up.  I thought that Palmer and Foster did not represent a continuation of that line of talent.  The fact that your top four tacklers are DBs could be a negative meaning that your front seven sucks at tackling, however, that could also mean that Arkansas State was running sweeps more than inside to avoid the D-Tackles.  Can someone comment?  We gave up a long pass of 50 yards and were outgained in the air.  If you think that Arkansas State can chuck it...what happens when we play a school that can actually pass?

2)Offensive Line- Despite the fact that we seem to have an endless supply of rotating beef on our offensive line, I am always concerned when Tony Hills is the dean of the offensive line.  I think we've been very spoiled recently with the inspired line play of the Kasey Studdards and Sendleins and Blalocks but if the University of Texas can't field a top flight offensive line, then we're worse than I thought.  We gained a paltry 3.1 yards per rush. That's patently unacceptable.  We had trouble punching it in from inside the five.  We were unable to get any decided edge in time of possession which (in my mind) means we couldn't run the damn ball.  

I am all for offensive innovation but true Texas football (as you all know) means running the ball when you have to...no wait...it means ramming the ball down the other guy's throat when you have to.  In their defense, the o-line only gave up one sack and didn't have a penalty until the fourth quarter.

3)Colt McCoy turning into Shea Morenz-  OK, perhaps I was waiting for the clock to strike midnight and the stagecoach to turn back into a pumpkin, but I didn't like what the box score said to me.   Yes, he had a 66.66% completion percentage but his average per pass was 6.7 yards.  The TDs he threw seemed to be to guys that were wide open.  It would seem that reading some of your posts that he was not sharp.  On the positive side though, he did convert 9 of 12 third down attempts.

4)"The Old Mack Brown"- I, personally, don't feel that you can ever complain about the personnel on this team.  By most accounts, we have a top 5 class every year.  We have injuries.  Other teams have injuries.   This year, my biggest Mack Brown worry is that he'll stick with guys who aren't playing to the level we need.   This is especially true at DB and LB.  Is Scott Derry still a starter?  Is Killebrew still one of our top three LBs?  Granted there were some suspensions and I applaud Mack for that...but some stuff better change before next week or we're gonna get our @$$e$ handed to us.

Just my .02.  Please advise.

by DreadedOne on Sep 2, 2007 8:23 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

paid 30 bucks to watch the game...

and I layed the 39 points as well.  In the end they were probably both bad decisions.  He're what I saw from the game:

Playcalling - offensive play calling was extremely simplified.  Little to no I-formation outside the goal line series.  We ran several counters, and one QB option which Charles took outside for a decent gain.  We lined up in the spread a couple of times, and Colt was locked in on his first receiver. Defensively, our CBs were lined up 10 yards off of their man on every play.  The defensive looks were very simple as well, you knew exactly who was blitzing.

The Offense - The line protected McCoy well but failed to open up the big holes that we were expecting. McCoy threw several ill-advised passes that should have been picked off.  The ones that were picked were a case of Colt trying to put a bit too much touch on the pass or just trying to force it in.  WRs dropped a few catchable balls.

The Defense - The secondary did not look capabale of making a big play.  Most passes were not contested (its hard to do when you are 10 yards off of your man who keeps running hooks or crosses).  The LBs (outside of Killebrew's drive saving personal foul penalty) played pretty well.  On several blitzes though they failed to recognize the run quickly and allowed the RB to go right past them through the holes.

All in all, This was probably a combination of us looking past the opponent, keeping ASU in the game for way too long, and keeping the playbook a bit to simple on both sides of the ball.  I don't think this automatically means we are a 7-5 team.  If the 'horns had spread the field more I believe we would have easily worked our way down the field and scored.  We treated this game like a preseason game and focused on getting the o-line and running game on track.  The offense gives me reason for optimism but can't say the same about this defense.  The talent just isn't there in the secondary.

by BMG on Sep 2, 2007 9:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Another personal foul on Killebrew?

What an idiot. Get him out of there.

by Caradoc on Sep 2, 2007 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Killebrew and his personal fouls

I was at the Rose Bowl and saw his dad almost get into fisticuffs with some drunk idiot USC fan.   I personally am very tired of Killebrew's drive-saving personal fouls.  Get him out of there.  I agree.

by DreadedOne on Sep 2, 2007 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i was listening to the game on radio...

WOAI...(Thanks again JohnsonUT).

And this was my first thought on one roughing penalty....

INT in the endzone... (none / 0)
woohoo....

who was the roughing penalty on? my guess without hearing is killebrew.

by bleed burnt orange on Sat Sep 01, 2007 at 06:31:56 PM MDT

[ Reply to This ]

turned out it was...Lokey, but it's obviously habitual.

by bleed burnt orange on Sep 2, 2007 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A more optimistic take than most comments

I agree with Peter here.  I think we will be fine.  It's not like TCU's offense is incredible.  Assuming Colt improves on his accuracy a little from the second half today, I just don't see TCU being able for force us into as many turnovers as they were able to force Baylor into.  I know we're all used to crushing teams like this to start off the season, but we won, and it was only close at the very end.  The only thing that really worries me is the inability to score in short yardage situations.  Where was Lokey at the goal line?  I think it would be a mistake to get too down on this team at this point.

by Texas Wahoo on Sep 2, 2007 9:24 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

game was never in doubt

misc. thoughts -

regardless of espn's sensational headline, this game was never in doubt.  

ASU wouldn't have scored again without Killabrew's PF assault of the ASU QB on 3rd and forever.

you think we practiced defending onside kicks last week?  ha.

Eddie Jones' interception was BEAUTIFUL. What an athlete.

J. Charles was bad in blitz pick-up.  

Leonard, the arkansas state QB, is a good player.

by cortexas on Sep 2, 2007 9:35 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

You are what you are. Killebrew extends drives often. They took advantage. And, until I see a reply showing me otherwise, I think ASU was screwed out of that onsides recovery.

We were lucky, because I know I don't have faith in our D to stop them from going 50 yards in 1 min with 2 timeouts to tie the game. Seems like doubt to me.

by tx78756 on Sep 2, 2007 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

we actually played pretty well for 18 minutes

for whatever reason, everybody on the field lost interest after that point.

colt missed a wide open Nate Jones on 3rd and 13 and then it was into the shitter.

by cortexas on Sep 2, 2007 11:35 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That was a bad pass

he just needed to get a little air under it.

Hell, Jones was so open he could have thrown it like a 500 game and he would have caught it.

Colt will be better next week.

by Wells on Sep 4, 2007 10:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.
Start posting about the Longhorns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ut_vs_fau_8-30-2008_049_small
Tebow Apologizes, Resumes Place at Right Hand of God

Recent FanPosts

Jackut_small
What a difference a year makes for the Longhorns!
Brandedbevo1024x768_small
Great ticket deal for Basketball this weekend.
Small
Notes from Mack Brown's Monday Press Conference
N1205698570_6375_small
The Purists vs. Objectivity
Small
K-State or Neb - who do you want?
Small
Throwback jerseys for A&M game
Texas_old3_small
Defense performance vs. non-conference
2401104_1__small
The Almost Perfect Day of College Football
Jackut_small
Can we stop talking about the Aggies now?
Small
Texas-Baylor 2nd Half Thread Photo Recommendations

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Site Editors

Pb6_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Menbooger_small GhostofBigRoy

Contributing Authors

Jersey_front_small 54b

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Small whills

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Small TheElusiveShadow

Me_small burnt in ny

Official Partner of CBS Sports