Many times this football season I found myself struggling to put in to words a sentiment I was having. On more than one occasion, LD from Gunslingers would nail that sentiment precisely for me.
Well, he's done it again. There's been lots of huffing and puffing about whether or not USC is a dynasty, and while I haven't had a whole lot to say on it, my general thought has been: we all agreed to the BCS system; if you win the BCS title, you're the national champ.
But as usual, LD nails it. In this excellent post he writes:
In either event, while USC has been very dominant over the last three years (and it's possible that their 2002 team might've been their best, by the end of the season), I don't think they're a dynasty. Being involved in the national title picture in three (or 4) years in a row is a tremendous accomplishment. But let's leave it at that.
I'm cool with that. Thanks, LD.